Case Update
I skipped over the court of appeals cases last Monday, so
we've got two weeks' worth of them to go through. Let's hit the highlights.
Add to the list of Things I Didn't Know: the victim can remain in the courtroom during
the trial, even if there's a separation of witnesses. That knowledge comes courtesy of the 1st
District's decision in State v. Maley. Back in 1994, Ohio voters passed the Victim's
Rights Amendment to the state constitution, and pursuant to that, the
legislature passed RC 2930.09, which allows the victim to be present in court
anytime the defendant is, "unless the court determines that exclusion of the
victim is necessary to protect the defendant's right to a fair trial." The judge's decision is reviewed for abuse of
discretion, and what's worse is that the Maley
court holds that more than a general claim of possible prejudice is
needed. What specific prejudice you
might be able to show I leave it to your imagination.
On the other hand, the 3rd District determines that there
are limits to the victim's rights in State v. Godfrey. In a vehicular manslaughter case, the lawyer
for the victim's family appeared at trial, asked to confer with the prosecutor
at one point to voice an objection, filed a brief in response to the defendant's
motion for new trial, and argued it before the court. Too much for the appellate court, which
decried "this highly unusual and potentially ill-advised combination of a civil
and a criminal matter."
Some tips on handling escape cases that arise from
violations of post-release control come in the 8th District's decision in State v. Viccaro. If the trial court didn't properly impose
post-release controls, the defendant can't be charged with a violation of
them. And in order to properly impose
it, the judge has to advise the defendant of the consequences of violating it,
both orally at the sentencing hearing and in the journal entry; doing one but
not the other doesn't cut it. The judge
in Viccaro's original case had warned him of the consequences at sentencing,
but didn't put it in the journal entry. The
court vacates the plea to escape that was entered over two years earlier, finding
that since Viccaro hadn't been properly placed on post-release control, the
indictment charging him with escape was void.
I've got a problem with filing an Anders brief after a trial; you should be able to find something, if only a manifest weight
claim. I've got a real problem with filing
one without the transcript of the trial, and so does the 1st District; in State v. Tsibouris, it grants the
motion to withdraw and appoint a new attorney to represent the defendant.
You have to complete your sentence in order to file for
expungement of your conviction, the 10th District reminds us in State v. Hoover, and that poses a
problem for the defendant in that case.
He'd received a lifetime driver's license suspension as a result of his
conviction of aggravated vehicular homicide, and the appellate court holds that
the suspension precludes Hoover from ever "completing" his sentence, and thus
becoming eligible to have it expunged.
Finally, I stopped doing the Bullshit Traffic Stop of the
Week⢠a while back, but it's not because they stopped happening. One of the usual culprits is the "marked lane"
violation: the defendant crosses the
center line or the right fog line on the roadway. Clarity is lent to this subject by the 6th
District in State v. Parker.To The court holds that to justify a vehicle stop for violation of the marked
lanes statute, the defendant's tires must travel completely over either the
center or fog line. The 5th District
came to the same conclusion earlier this year in State v. Marcum.
Comments