Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »


Friday Roundup

Death penalty news.  Two people were sentenced to death in Texas last week.  That would hardly be news - Texas has executed 530 people since the death penalty was reinstated in 1976, almost five times more than the next highest state (Oklahoma) - except for this:  we're ten months into 2015, and those were the first death sentences handed down in the Lone Star State this year.  In 2000, juries there imposed capital punishment on 48 defendants.  That's as many death sentences as have been handed down in the past six years combined.

Ohio, which has executed 53 people during that time, the highest of any non-Southern or border state, won't be killing anyone any more this year.  In fact, the last time a death sentence was carried out here, it resulted in Dennis McGuire's horribly botched execution.  Governor Kasich recently postponed all executions until 2017.  Arkansas and Oklahoma have also imposed a moratorium on executions. 

The reason for the decline in death sentences is the alternative punishment of life without parole, and juries getting squeamish about people being exonerated after spending twenty and even thirty years on death row.  The reason for the decline in executions is the drying up of execution drugs.  Pharmaceutical companies won't sell them anymore because of public backlash, and so states have had to look to "other sources."

One of those sources, according to a story in Buzzfeed, is room 818 of a building in Kolkata, India, where Chris Harris operates a business known as HarrisPharma.  Harris is a salesman, and a pretty good one at that; despite having no pharmaceutical background, he's sold thousands of vials of execution drugs to states hard-pressed to find another source.  He sold enough to Nebraska for them to conduct 300 executions, which in itself is fascinating:  Nebraska's executed three people in the 39 years, the legislature voted to abolish the death penalty, and after the governor's veto the issue is being submitted to statewide referendum this year.  Even if the public votes to continue capital punishment, HarrisPharma won't be of any help; the FDA intends to impound Nebraska's shipment, because the drug is illegal in the United States. 

Harris claims to have sold his drug to five other states as well.  None of them have been used, after questions of their legality were raised.

Sentencing news.  The longest journey begins with a single step, and federal sentencing reform began its journey with the passage by the Senate Judiciary Committee, by 15-5 vote, of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015.  You can find a summary of the bill's sections here, a section-by-section breakdown here, and, for those of you with nothing to do until the new Stars Wars movie comes out, the full text of the bill here.

Since you pay me to read this stuff and tell you about it - oh, wait... -- the very short version is that the reforms are directed toward drug offenders.  Under current law, mandatory minimum sentences can be imposed if the defendant has any prior drug felonies; the new law would limit those to serious drug felonies.  The "safety valve," which allows judges to go under the minimum mandatory sentence in drug offenses, has been substantially expanded:  now, a defendant has to have no more than one criminal history point (a misdemeanor conviction), while the new law would increase the allowable points to four, although disqualifying offenders who have prior violent or drug trafficking convictions.  One of the key provisions is to make the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the sentencing disparity between crack and powder cocaine offenses, retroactive.

Signs of the times.  Smith College was founded in 1870, courtesy of a donation of $400,000 by Sophia Smith, as the first women's college to be founded by a woman.  And it's only for women.  But how would Caitlynn, née Bruce, Jenner fare if she applied?  Just fine, as indicated by Smith's Admissions Policy page:

Are trans women eligible for admission to Smith?

 Applicants who were assigned male at birth but identify as women are eligible for admission.

Are trans men eligible for admission?

 Smith does not accept applications from men. Those assigned female at birth but who now identify as male are not eligible for admission.

Under this newly clarified policy, what is required of applicants to be considered for admission?

 Smith's policy is one of self-identification. To be considered for admission, applicants must select 'female' on the Common Application.

In short, the school will not admit women who are actually women if they identify as men.


Recent Entries

  • July 26, 2017
    Supreme Court Recap - 2016 Term
    My annual review of the Supreme Court decisions from the past term
  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax