Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

A rush to death

Dennis McGuire was the last man to be executed in Ohio.  The manner of his demise generated debate.  McGuire was a guinea pig for the new drug Ohio uses to kill people, and things didn't go well:  according to witnesses, McGuire appeared to gasp and convulse for over 20 minutes before succumbing.   To the dwindling band of death penalty supporters, the problem was not what happened on the gurney, it was McGuire's lengthy route to it:  he'd committed the crime for which he was executed a full quarter century before.

Not that we haven't tried to shorten that.  Back in the 1994, Ohio passed the Death Penalty Appeals Amendment to the state constitution, which mandated that all death penalty appeals go directly to the Ohio Supreme Court, bypassing the district court of appeals.  Two years later, Congress passed the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA), greatly limiting the availability of the "Great Writ" of habeas corpus, in an attempt to stop federal courts from putting up roadblocks to execution. 

And so we come to the oral argument two weeks ago in the oral argument in the Supreme Court in Hall v. Florida.  

The case concerned execution of the mentally retarded, which the Supreme Court outlawed in 2002; the issue in Hall was just how retarded you had to be to avoid being given the opportunity to select your last meal.  (Speaking of which, Bill Clinton left the campaign trail in 1992 to return to Arkansas and sign a death warrant for Ricky Ray Rector, who was so mentally unaware that he told the guards that he wanted to save the piece of pecan pie, the dessert for his last meal, "for later.")

Florida had drawn a bright line.  Back in high school, getting a 70 on a test meant you passed, however ingloriously.  To Florida, having an IQ of 70 is enough to let the state execute you.

That was overshadowed, though, by the fact that the killing which had earned Hall a death sentence occurred way back in 1978.  "How has it gone on this long?" Scalia inquired, exasperated.  Kennedy pointed out that "the last ten people Florida has executed have spent an average of 24.9 years on death row," asked whether that was "consistent with the purposes of the death penalty," and "consistent with sound administration of the justice system," and wondered if the Florida attorney general had suggested to the state legislature "any measures, any provisions, any statutes, to expedite the consideration these cases." 

The dismay is understandable.  Justice delayed is justice denied, and all that.  But there's a larger context here.

The arguments for capital punishment have fallen by the way, one by one.  No, it's not reserved for the worst of the worst, but for the unluckiest of the unlucky.  The need to protect society was resolved with life without parole sentences.  Punishment and retribution sound so Biblical.

So what's left is deterrence, and that one gets slapped by the facts.  In the past 20 years, the number of death sentences annually imposed has fallen from 320 to 70.  If the death penalty were indeed a deterrent, we would expect that the homicide would increase as the number of sentences declined.  It was just the reverse:  during that same period, the homicide rate dropped by more than half. 

But supporters insist that's because the death penalty is used too hesitantly.  Most criminals are not interested in the Long Game; what might happen a quarter-century from now is not comprehensible for someone whose plans have rarely extended into the next week.  But if justice were swift and sure, if a criminal knew he would be executed within, say, five years, that might do the trick.

It would also have killed Glenn Ford.  He was sentenced to death for killing a man in Louisiana in 1984.  A week ago, he was released from prison, prosecutors having found "credible evidence" that Ford "was neither present at, nor a participant in, the robbery and murder" of the victim.  Turns out that one of the co-defendants who testified against Ford was the actual gunman. 

That's not atypical.  Of the 45 people convicted of a capital crime and later exonerated, only 9 spent less than a decade in prison before they were freed.

Things change much more rapidly than they used to.  It took blacks almost a century to gain real freedom.  Ten years ago, the support for gay marriage and marijuana legalization was minimal; thirteen states overwhelmingly passed amendments banning gay marriage, and polls showed two-thirds of the public was opposed to legalizing marijuana.  Now, those positions have reversed.  

Support for the death penalty is still strong; the latest Gallup poll shows that, by 60%-38%, the public still favors it.  But that 22-point margin was down from a 64-point margin two decades ago.

I now think that I will see the death penalty abolished in my lifetime.  And not with a bang, but a whimper.

Search

Recent Entries

  • June 23, 2017
    Crime and the First Amendment
    Facebook and sex offenders, and encouraging someone to kill himself
  • June 20, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    I come a cropper, plus inventory searches and mandatory probation
  • June 19, 2017
    Case Update - SCOTUS
    What's coming up in the US Supreme Court in the next two weeks
  • June 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    After weeks in the desert, we come upon an oasis of defense wins
  • June 7, 2017
    A switch in time
    Why what the Supreme Court did in Aalim II and Gonzales II is a bad thing
  • June 6, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A turnabout on prior calculation and design, and harmless error in all its manifestations
  • June 5, 2017
    Case Update
    A death penalty case, fourteen years after the crime, and we're just getting started. And two appellate decisions on search and seizure.
  • May 31, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    "What's a law enforcement accountability activist?" asked someone never, but the answer is here. Plus, cell phone experts, joinder, and the fading glory that was State v. Hand.
  • May 30, 2017
    Case Update
    One searches SCOTUSblog in vain for decisions which would be of interest to the uncounted hordes of this blog's regular readers; one of the Court's opinions last week deals with the Hague Service Convention's rules on international service by mail,...
  • May 25, 2017
    "Clarifying" post-release controls
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Grimes