Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

An unlikely story

Every trial is a story.  The prosecution has a story.  The defense has a story.  Oftentimes, the defense story is nothing more than that the prosecution hasn't proved their story beyond a reasonable doubt.

The prosecution's story in my rape case was that four black guys in their twenties and thirties picked up a drunk 19-year-old white girl from in front of the casino, took her back to their house, took turns raping her, then dropped her off at a local gas station, where she promptly called the police.

That's a pretty good story.  And since there was DNA all over the place -- including places you don't want to know about -- the defense story had to be consent:  that the girl chose to have serial sex with four guys, and her faculties were not impaired when she made that choice.

I liked the prosecution story better.  So did Frank and Rich, who were representing the other two defendants.  Didn't matter what we thought; any plea deal would have to be a package, with all three defendants signing on (the fourth wasn't caught), and Frank's guy wasn't going to cop to anything.

One of the problems of trying a case with co-defendants is that the lawyers can wind up stepping all over themselves:  you want to make some points, but buy the time it's your turn to cross-examine, the points have been muddied up and the jury is bored to death anyway.  That never happened here.  Frank did a great job of setting the table, Rich did a methodical job with the major points, and I'd tidy everything up.  Here's a vignette:  me cross-examining the DNA analyst about why the rectal swab came back positive.  "Wouldn't it be possible after sex in the missionary position for semen to leak from the vagina and into the anal cavity?"  "Yes," she replied.

Mother would be so proud.

We've come a long way in our treatment of women and sex offenses, but it still boils down to the character and credibility of the woman.  To sell our story, we had to cast the alleged victim for the role of someone who would agree to have sex with four guys, and the 19-year-old girl here, whom we'll call Molly, fit the bill perfectly.  Not because she was trampy, although that was a part of it.  She wasn't very bright.  She testified about being raped with as much emotion as you'd expect from someone describing their lawnmower being stolen.  And she was such an obviously damaged soul with so few boundaries in her life, her story so full of inconsistencies, that no juror would find her credible.

They didn't.  After seven days of trial, the jury was out little more than an hour, with an acquittal on all twenty-one counts.  I did my best to comfort the prosecutor.  "Jeez, after that one, Scott, you deserve a nun for your next victim."

Mother would be so proud.

Rich and I were assigned counsel, and the maximum fee for a felony one in Cuyahoga County was $1,000.  That's what it had been for the past quarter century, anyway, but the powers-that-be loosened the purse strings, and now it's all the way up to $1,500.  That was effective February 1, but only applies to cases assigned after that date, and we'd been assigned four months ago.  I actually had about 55 hours in the case, and at the exorbitant hourly rates -- $50 for out-court-time, $60 for in-court -- that came to over $3,800.  Rich, who had about the same, suggested we file for extraordinary fees, and I agreed.  We asked for $2,000, and figured they'd at least give us the $1,500 under the new rates.

A week later, I walked into the judge's courtroom.  There were a bunch of schoolkids clustered around the bench, but he looked up at me and said, "Mr. Bensing, I thought you did an excellent job trying the case, and I denied your motion for additional fees." 

It didn't go particularly well after that.  His final comment to me was, "We appreciate what you guys do."

Mine was, "Yeah, you just don't want to pay for it."

I start another rape trial next week.  I was assigned to it back in October.

Search

Recent Entries

  • June 20, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    I come a cropper, plus inventory searches and mandatory probation
  • June 19, 2017
    Case Update - SCOTUS
    What's coming up in the US Supreme Court in the next two weeks
  • June 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    After weeks in the desert, we come upon an oasis of defense wins
  • June 7, 2017
    A switch in time
    Why what the Supreme Court did in Aalim II and Gonzales II is a bad thing
  • June 6, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A turnabout on prior calculation and design, and harmless error in all its manifestations
  • June 5, 2017
    Case Update
    A death penalty case, fourteen years after the crime, and we're just getting started. And two appellate decisions on search and seizure.
  • May 31, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    "What's a law enforcement accountability activist?" asked someone never, but the answer is here. Plus, cell phone experts, joinder, and the fading glory that was State v. Hand.
  • May 30, 2017
    Case Update
    One searches SCOTUSblog in vain for decisions which would be of interest to the uncounted hordes of this blog's regular readers; one of the Court's opinions last week deals with the Hague Service Convention's rules on international service by mail,...
  • May 25, 2017
    "Clarifying" post-release controls
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Grimes
  • May 23, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Allied offenses, and two search cases