Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »


Friday Roundup

A woman scorned.  Here's the way it starts:

Carol Ann Bond was excited when her closest friend, Myrlinda Haynes, announced that she was pregnant.  Bond’s excitement turned to rage when she learned that her husband, Clifford Bond, was the child’s father.  She vowed revenge.

The plot outline for the latest Lifetime Movie Network event?  No, it's from one of the opening paragraphs in the 3rd Circuit's decision last year in US v. BondOne moral of the story is that it's not a good idea to sleep with your best friend's husband if your best friend is employed by a chemical manufacturer.  (Using proper birth control might be Lesson #2.)  Bond obtained several toxic chemicals which work on minimal topical contact -- through the skin -- and spread them on Haynes' house doorknob, car door handles, and mailbox.

For that, Bond was convicted of in Federal court of possessing and using a chemical weapon.  She appealed on the grounds that the offense was an unconstitutional appropriation of powers reserved to the states, but the 3rd Circuit rejected that, finding that the statute was enacted to implement the treaty obligations of the United States under the 1993 Chemical Weapons Convention, and therefore fell under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Congress' powers under the Constitution.

Last week, the Supreme Court granted cert, and that could prove to be very interesting.  On the one hand, the Court gave a rather expansive reading to the Necessary and Proper Clause just last term in US v. Comstock, which upheld a law allowing Federal sex offenders to be civilly committed after expiration of their sentences, against the argument that civil commitment and mental health issues were traditionally reserved to the states.  On the other hand, as I explained after the Circuit Court's decision came down in Comstock striking down the law, there's growing concern over the expansion of Federal crimes into areas which normally fall within the ambit of the states, such as Rajah Baylor's conviction and 12-year sentence for robbing a Little Caesar's in Cleveland, prosecuted under the Federal Hobbs Act.  Back in the 1990's, the Court expressed some interest in reining in the Federal government's powers by resuscitating the 10th Amendment, moribund since the 1930's.  It'll be interesting to see how Bond's case plays out.

Fun on the high seas.  People keep telling me I ought to go on a cruise.  They say it's the best time they ever had.  Never been on one, although I've been thinking about it.  My thinking took a turn for the worse after reading Cruise Law News.  I first read about Cruise Law News; it's a blog done by Jim Walker of Walker & O'Neill, who are "maritime lawyers."  For a long time, Jim made his living defending cruise companies from lawsuits.  He switched sides a few years back, and now makes a living suing them.

His former employers filed motions to disqualify him from those cases, with no luck.  Well, whatever he wanted to stay with them, they should have paid.  And forget what he costs them in his lawsuits; his blog alone is a powerful disincentive to those contemplating a Caribbean cruise.  For example, thinking about touching down in St. Thomas, in the Virgin Islands?  Their web site informs us that "when walking in St. Thomas, you will see the bustle of  Main Street, and cool emerald hills."  You will also probably see bodies stacked up like cordwood, at least according to Jim Walker; he informs us that "St. Thomas has one of the highest homicide rates in the world," clocking in with 42 so far this year in a population of only 100,000.  By comparison, the chances of winding up with a toe-tag in a Detroit morgue as a result of foul play are only 46 per 100,000.  Another post offers headlines like "18 Passengers from Royal Caribbean & Disney Cruise Ships Robbed by Shotgun in the Bahamas."

What would Mickey Mouse say?

'Tis the season.  Probably one of the smartest investments I ever made was in a TiVo system.  (At the other end of the scale was the ten large I sunk into a limited partnership in a real estate deal in Atlanta in which, my ex-financial advisor assured me, I would double my money in a couple of years.  Five years later, I got an invitation to join the class action lawsuit against the general partners.  If you're new to the investment game, this is Not a Good Sign.)  I haven't watched live TV, except for sporting events, in years.

Which spares me the ordeal of watching the plethora of political ads telling me why Jim Smith must be elected to Congress to in order to save the country from the wretched socialistic excesses of Barry Jones.  But every now and then, a political ad goes so over the top that I'm sorry I missed it.  In this case, I would not only have to watch live TV, I'd have to live in Orleans Parish, where, of all things, the race for coroner has generated this ad, comparing the incumbent to Dr. Frankenstein:


Just a reminder that I'm going to be on vacation the next couple of weeks.  If I post anything here during that time, you can be sure it won't be about law.  I'll start back with that on November 1.


Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States