Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Friday Roundup

Drug Wars.  In just five weeks, we'll find out if California becomes the first state to legalize recreational marijuana.  Some people aren't going to be happy if they do:  as this article from The Hill (h/t to Sentencing Law & Policy) indicates, one of those people is Rep. Lamar Smith of Texas, who's fuming because the Obama administration has scaled back enforcement of laws against medical marijuana dispensaries.  Smith has called for stronger enforcement of all drug laws, and opposed the revision of the sentencing guidelines which reduced the disparity between how crack and powder cocaine were treated. 

So why should anyone care about the rantings of a representative from Texas?  Because Smith is likely to be the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee if the GOP takes over Congress in the upcoming elections, which most analysts have concluded is about a 65% probability.

Going back to the California proposition battle, the political alignments are rather fascinating.  The California Beer & Beverage Distributors have come out against the proposition, as have police groups.  The economic interests of the former group are readily discernible.  The latter?  As noted by this article,

Police forces are entitled to keep property seized as part of drug raids and the revenue stream that comes from waging the drug war has become a significant source of support for local law enforcement. Federal and state funding of the drug war is also a significant supplement to local forces' budgets.

On the flip side, the teachers and the Teamsters have come out in support of the proposition.  Why?  Because the Teamsters are trying to oganize pot growers, and the teachers want the additional revenue that could be raised by legalizing weed.

Lindsay Lohan Update.  No, this isn't turning into an online version of People magazine.  (Especially since there already is an online version of People magazine.  And don't make fun of People too much.  I was in court the other day, wasting my time -- but I repeat myself -- and grabbed a copy of InTouch, one of the many People competitors.  Apparently, InTouch's key demographic is people with ADD:  lots of pictures, stories that run two paragraphs at most.)

Where was I?  Oh, yes, further evidence of my sub-par prognosticative skills:  barely two months ago, I recounted Lindsay's most recent arrest and incarceration for alcohol and drug-related arrests, linked to a blog holding a contest to determine which of Lindsay's three mug shots was the best, and calculated that, given the pace of Lindsay's brushes with the law, the contest could be re-run "about eight months from now, this time giving contestants four options."  Oh ye of little faith.  It took Ms. Lohan a mere quarter of that time to test positive and earn another stay in jail and, as Legal Blogwatch shows, another mugshot.

Thought provoking post of the day.   From Balkinization:

I have four points I want to make today against constitutional idolatry, which is my label for our misguided tendency to blindly worship the Constitution, giving it credit for all the things we love and honor about our country.

(1) The Framers' constitution, to a large degree, represented values we should abhor or at least reject today.

(2) There are parts of the Constitution with which we are still stuck today even though we would never freely choose them and they are impossible to defend based on contemporary values.

(3) For the most part, the Constitution is irrelevant to the current political design of our nation.

(4) The rights protections we do enjoy today, the importance of which I do not minimize, are mostly a function of political and social mores, which have dramatically evolved over time and owe relatively little to courts using the Constitution to protect them.

Discuss.

Search

Recent Entries

  • May 22, 2017
    Case Update
    Is SCOTUS looking for a forfeiture case? Plus, appellate decisions on expungement and restitution, plain error, and what a judge has to tell a defendant about sex registration
  • May 19, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part II
    Decisions on lineups and prior calculation and design, and two out of eight (eight!) pro se defendants come up winners,
  • May 17, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part I
    Taking a first look at some of the 8th District's decisions over the past two weeks
  • May 16, 2017
    Case Update
    Stock tips, Federal sentencing reform goes dormant, schoolbag searches, and the retroactivity of State v. Hand
  • May 8, 2017
    Case Update
    Death in Arkansas, a worrisome disciplinary decision, and appellate cases on speedy trial, arson registration, use of prior testimony, and the futility of post-conviction relief
  • May 2, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Nothing but sex
  • May 1, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS closes out oral argument for the Term, the Ohio Supreme Court has seven of them this week, and we report on a decision where you'll probably want to play Paul Simon's "Still Crazy After All These Years" in the background while you read about it
  • April 26, 2017
    MIA
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives