Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Coming soon to a courtroom near you
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Bargaining over death
  • Missouri v. Frye: The Judge
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Original sin
  • Case Update
  • Open discovery — pushing the envelope?


  • Archives

  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Friday Roundup

    August 27th, 2010

    I had four criminal pretrials and a hearing yesterday.  That’s not my normal workload; on Wednesday I had nothing in court, which allowed me to get a brief done.  That’s how I like to work things:  if I have to go over to the court, I’d just as soon waste my time on five cases as on one.

    Which is what I pretty much what I did.  Three pretrials got continued to another date, by which time I’ll have discovery, and maybe we can work something out, or not.  The hearing, on a motion to suppress, was obviated by the State’s willingness to offer me a misdemeanor.  This is how bad the search was:  in front of one of the most prosecution-friendly judges on the bench, and in the face of the insistence by the police officers involved that the defendant plead to a felony, they offered me a misdemeanor. 

    But I did get one case resolved:  I got another misdemeanor plea on a drug trafficking case.  Twenty bucks worth of marijuana.  That leaves me with two other cases involving a $20 dollar sale of marijuana. 

    One thing my clients can be thankful for:  they’re still alive.

    Trevon Cole wasn’t so lucky.

    Trevon was targeted by the Las Vegas police as a “major drug dealer.”  It was the wrong Trevon Cole; the one the police were looking for had a different middle name, was seven years older, three inches shorter, and a hundred pounds lighter.  And even his “lengthy criminal history of narcotics sales, trafficking, and possession charges” amounted to three misdemeanor marijuana possession arrests.  Still, that was more than the criminal record of the real Trevon Cole, the one who wound up dead; he had an unauthorized use of a motor vehicle as a teenager.

    The police nonetheless managed to set up three controlled buys with Cole, for a total of 1.8 ounces of marijuana.  They wanted to make a bigger purchase — $400 worth — but “major drug dealer” Trevon Cole had to back out, because he didn’t have that much stuff.

    On the night of June 11, the police narcotics squad raided Cole’s house.   The raid didn’t go well.  The front door required four hits from the battering ram before it opened, longer than normal.  The police rushed in, and Det. Bryan Yant kicked open the bathroom door.  Cole was kneeling in front of the toilet, and despite Yant’s commands to show his hands, Cole rose, turned toward Yant, and thrust his hand toward Yant as if he had a gun.  Yant shot and killed him.  “Unfortunately he made an aggressive act toward me.  He made me do my job,” said Yant.

    That’s Yant’s version, anyway, but there’s nothing else to support it.  The position of Cole’s body, and the downward angle of the bullet through his cheek to his neck, demonstrated that Yant’s story was physically impossible; the medical examiner and the homicide detective who investigated the shooting concluded that Cole had been bent over the toilet when he was shot.  A more likely explanation for the shooting, from the accounts of the other police officers who heard the door kick and gun shot virtually simultaneously, is that Yant had accidentally discharged his gun when he kicked down the door.  Of the six police officers present, five didn’t hear Bryant say anything to Cole before the shot was fired, and the sixth didn’t hear Bryant say anything to Cole about his hands.

    In any event, the whole thing went in front of a coroner’s inquest earlier this week.  If there was a betting line in Vegas on the outcome, it would have heavily favored Byrant:  of approximately 200 coroner’s inquests in the city into officer-involved killings since 1976, only one has resulted in a finding against the officer.  That one was for criminal negligence, and was subsequently overturned.  Det. Bryant himself was no stranger to the process:  in an incident a few years ago, he was absolved of killing a man whom he claimed was threatening him with a gun.  The coroner’s jury took only 30 minutes to acquit him, despite the fact that the gun was found 35 feet away from the victim’s body.  In Cole’s death, the inquest took a whole 90 minutes before concluding that the killing was justified.

    California is electing a governor and a US Senator, but a lot of attention on the election results from that state this November will focus on the fate of Proposition 19, which would legalize marijuana.  It’s been leading fairly consistently in the polls — a SurveyUSA poll last week had it up 50-40 — but you don’t know how the undecideds are going to break, and even soft support for it might be swayed by things like the op-ed by the six current and previous drug czars in the LA Times.

    I don’t buy into a lot of the arguments made by the proponents of legalization.  I think it’s unquestionably going to lead to greater use.  There are a lot of people who don’t use drugs simply because they’re illegal, and making it legal is going to eliminate that disincentive.  I don’t think it’s going to bring in much additional revenue.

    But Trevon Cole’s finacee was present at the time of the raid.  She was 8½ months pregnant at the time.  I’m pretty sure I know how she’d vote.

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    General Division
    Domestic Relations
    Juvenile
    Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Supreme Court
    Geauga Common Pleas
    Lake Common Pleas
    Lorain Common Pleas
    Summit Common Pleas

    Links to all Ohio Courts

    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    Supreme Court
    6th Circuit
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Concurring Opinions
    Simple Justice
    A Public Defender
    Defending People
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Lowering the Bar
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    Snitching Blog
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Legal Blogwatch
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Jeff Gamso's Blog
    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Bullseye Blog (PI law)
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    Ohio Employment Law Blog
    Ohio Practical Business Law
    Ohio Environmental Law Blog
    Other Ohio law blogs


    Criminal Defense Bars

    Ohio (OACDL)
    Cuyahoga County (CCDLA)
    National (NACDL)


    Legal Discussion Forum

    Attorneys Forum - Legal Help and Law Discussion Forums.


    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs