Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

Well, SCOTUS's term has ended, and the Ohio Supreme Court didn't favor us with any decisions over the past week, so we'll just go to the court of appeals cases.  In a minute; first, though, an important announcement.  No Briefcase on Friday, since I will be celebrating my birthday.  Just like the 37 that preceded it, it should be a gala affair, as this artist's rendition of last year's demonstrates.  You'll want to check Saturday's police blotter for the casualty list. 

I'll have the 8th District roundup tomorrow, a look at some of the potential problems with the new criminal discovery rules on Wednesday, and a recap of the important decisions from the 2009 Supreme Court term on Thursday. 

By the way, there are a number of statements in the above paragraph that are actually true.

In the courts of appeals, where there's not much going on either...

Criminal.  1st District says that victim's statement immediately after he'd been shot four times identifying defendant as shooter was dying declaration and excited utterance, not testimonial; thorough discussion of issue... 8th District rejects claim that failure to abide by Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, which requires a foreign national to be advised of his right to seek advice from his consulate if he is arrested, requires suppression of any statements; every other Ohio court to consider this issue has ruled the same way... Two aggravated burglary convictions should have merged, says 2nd District; despite fact that there were two victims in residence, and multiple thefts occurred, there was only one animus for the trespass... 8th District rules that trial court erred in not advising defendant at sentencing hearing what would be penalty for violation of community control sanctions; inclusion of that in journal entry is not sufficient...

Civil.  10th District holds that statute of limitations for actions against state for employment discrimination is two years as per sovereign immunity statute, not six years as per discrimination statute... Landlord not liable to plaintiff for injuries due to bite by tenant's dog when landlord is not in possession of the premises, says 5th District...

What's in a name.  In City of Toledo v. Gaston, the 6th District upholds a bond forfeiture order against the You Walk Bail Bond Agency, Inc.  As you might have gathered, the defendant took the bonding company's name a little too literally, and never showed up for trial.

Search

Recent Entries

  • September 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Prior consistent statements, whether State v. Hand is applied retroactively, and a big Coming Attraction
  • September 11, 2017
    Case Update
    Looking back at Melendez-Diaz, and the 8th goes 0 for 2 in the Supreme Court
  • September 8, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Pro bono work, screwed-up appeals, and is Subway shorting their customers?
  • September 5, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The barriers to expungement, jury verdict forms, and hybrid representation
  • August 31, 2017
    Constructive possession
    Constructive possession is 9/10ths of the law
  • August 29, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A traffic stop found Samson Primm in possession of a few grams of marijuana, but he hires a lawyer and files a motion to suppress the stop. On the day of trial, the City asks to dismiss the case. Primm...
  • August 28, 2017
    Truth in plea bargaining
    So I got a brochure last week from Judge Donnelly over at the Common Pleas court. As you can see, it's a panel discussion on plea bargaining. The judge asked me to get out the word, so I just sort...
  • August 15, 2017
    Summer Break
    Got a bunch of stuff to do over the next couple weeks, and with the slowdown in the courts, it's a good time to take a break. I'll be back here on August 28. See you then....
  • August 11, 2017
    Friday Musings
    Drug trafficking, ADA lawsuit abuse, and e-filing
  • August 10, 2017
    Case Update
    Waiting on SCOTUS; two Ohio Supreme Court decisions