Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

Well, SCOTUS's term has ended, and the Ohio Supreme Court didn't favor us with any decisions over the past week, so we'll just go to the court of appeals cases.  In a minute; first, though, an important announcement.  No Briefcase on Friday, since I will be celebrating my birthday.  Just like the 37 that preceded it, it should be a gala affair, as this artist's rendition of last year's demonstrates.  You'll want to check Saturday's police blotter for the casualty list. 

I'll have the 8th District roundup tomorrow, a look at some of the potential problems with the new criminal discovery rules on Wednesday, and a recap of the important decisions from the 2009 Supreme Court term on Thursday. 

By the way, there are a number of statements in the above paragraph that are actually true.

In the courts of appeals, where there's not much going on either...

Criminal.  1st District says that victim's statement immediately after he'd been shot four times identifying defendant as shooter was dying declaration and excited utterance, not testimonial; thorough discussion of issue... 8th District rejects claim that failure to abide by Article 36 of the Vienna Convention, which requires a foreign national to be advised of his right to seek advice from his consulate if he is arrested, requires suppression of any statements; every other Ohio court to consider this issue has ruled the same way... Two aggravated burglary convictions should have merged, says 2nd District; despite fact that there were two victims in residence, and multiple thefts occurred, there was only one animus for the trespass... 8th District rules that trial court erred in not advising defendant at sentencing hearing what would be penalty for violation of community control sanctions; inclusion of that in journal entry is not sufficient...

Civil.  10th District holds that statute of limitations for actions against state for employment discrimination is two years as per sovereign immunity statute, not six years as per discrimination statute... Landlord not liable to plaintiff for injuries due to bite by tenant's dog when landlord is not in possession of the premises, says 5th District...

What's in a name.  In City of Toledo v. Gaston, the 6th District upholds a bond forfeiture order against the You Walk Bail Bond Agency, Inc.  As you might have gathered, the defendant took the bonding company's name a little too literally, and never showed up for trial.

Search

Recent Entries

  • March 20, 2017
    Taking time off
    I'm taking the week off. Have a major brief due on Thursday, plus a trial in Federal court starting next Monday. Plus, I'm pretty sure that Obama wiretapped me, too, so I'm working on getting to the bottom of that....
  • March 17, 2017
    What's Up with the 8th?
    The 8th District cases come out every Thursday. By about ten o'clock in the morning, the court will have posted the "weekly decision list" on its web site. It will give a summary of the case, usually in a sentence...
  • March 14, 2017
    Rippo and Pena-Rodriguez
    SCOTUS issues decisions on judicial recusal and biased jurors
  • March 13, 2017
    Case Update
    A SCOTUS decision on career offenders, and appellate cases on what a judge can consider in sentencing, and untimely motions to suppress
  • March 9, 2017
    A switch in time
    The court reverses itself in Gonzalez
  • March 8, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    More sentencing stories, and the right way to handle an Anders brief
  • March 7, 2017
    Case Update
    Knock and announce and the Ohio Constitution, and Anders briefs.
  • March 6, 2017
    Never mind
    The Ohio Supreme Court reverses Gonzalez.
  • March 2, 2017
    Of bright lines and bookbags
    Oral argument in State v. Oles and State v. Polk
  • February 28, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A good outcome in a search case, probably a good outcome (to be) in a drug case, and a very bad outcome in a child rape case