Comments on: Friday Roundup http://briefcase8.com/2010/07/23/friday-roundup-66/ Case analysis with an attitude Wed, 23 May 2012 10:52:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: PJL http://briefcase8.com/2010/07/23/friday-roundup-66/comment-page-1/#comment-83663 PJL Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:10:53 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=3222#comment-83663 what you didn't like my comment? erased it so no one could see me calling you out on your plagerized crap.. insecure much? can't handle the truth? federal prosecuters and judges come at a price. the not so rich go to prison and the very rich like the billionare in florida get house arrest for raping underage girls. once a pedophile always a pedophile. no sense of humor about BP photoshopping photos of their spouting oil well. so much more fun when it is at the expense of someone in an orange jumpsuit. self righteous much. you really should take more than your birthday off from your plagerized friday crap that you steal from other writers. what you didn’t like my comment? erased it so no one could see me calling you out on your plagerized crap.. insecure much? can’t handle the truth? federal prosecuters and judges come at a price. the not so rich go to prison and the very rich like the billionare in florida get house arrest for raping underage girls. once a pedophile always a pedophile. no sense of humor about BP photoshopping photos of their spouting oil well. so much more fun when it is at the expense of someone in an orange jumpsuit. self righteous much. you really should take more than your birthday off from your plagerized friday crap that you steal from other writers.

]]> By: JAG http://briefcase8.com/2010/07/23/friday-roundup-66/comment-page-1/#comment-83071 JAG Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:59:18 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=3222#comment-83071 I worked on appeal to CA-10 (Franklin) where defendant was found guilty of using "improper language" for saying (in a bar near OSU campus) "mother-fucker" and "fuck you" in "mixed company." Challenge was that the (1) affidavit failed to allege the ordinance element of "abuse another" and (2) the ordinance was void for vagueness contra the Due Process Clause. CA-10 Assigned errors 1 & 2 overruled; affirmed SCO Motion to Certify Overruled ─ Appeal Dismissed SCOTUS: Per curiam, Reversed 6-3 R. Raymond Twohig, Hr. (now Federal P. D. in NM took the case to SCO and SCOTUS (Appeal not Cert.) A slang dictionary them (early '70's) listed nearly 300 "fuck" definitions other than coitus. Actually, J Jackson's pasty was much larger than those on dancers in liquor licensed bars. The FCC needs to lighten up. Personally, I like the phrase EIC! the acronym "engage in coitus!" Folks think you are speaking of Dwight Eisenhower. ☺ I worked on appeal to CA-10 (Franklin) where defendant was found guilty of using “improper language” for saying (in a bar near OSU campus) “mother-fucker” and “fuck you” in “mixed company.”

Challenge was that the
(1) affidavit failed to allege the ordinance element of “abuse another” and
(2) the ordinance was void for vagueness contra the Due Process Clause.

CA-10 Assigned errors 1 & 2 overruled; affirmed
SCO Motion to Certify Overruled ─ Appeal Dismissed
SCOTUS: Per curiam, Reversed 6-3

R. Raymond Twohig, Hr. (now Federal P. D. in NM took the case to SCO and SCOTUS (Appeal not Cert.) A slang dictionary them (early ’70′s) listed nearly 300 “fuck” definitions other than coitus.

Actually, J Jackson’s pasty was much larger than those on dancers in liquor licensed bars.

The FCC needs to lighten up. Personally, I like the phrase EIC! the acronym “engage in coitus!” Folks think you are speaking of Dwight Eisenhower. ☺

]]> By: Brian McGraw http://briefcase8.com/2010/07/23/friday-roundup-66/comment-page-1/#comment-83067 Brian McGraw Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:12:13 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=3222#comment-83067 Russ, we need to get a "good time" provision in Ohio like that. 90 days down to two weeks? Awesome. Russ, we need to get a “good time” provision in Ohio like that. 90 days down to two weeks? Awesome.

]]>