http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/04/a-new-look-at-12b6/ Case analysis with an attitude Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:47:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/04/a-new-look-at-12b6/comment-page-1/#comment-69660 Russ Bensing Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:37:30 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2619#comment-69660 I agree; I really don't think Twombly was that much of a change. Iqbal's an entirely different matter. So far, no Ohio court has cited that decision. I agree; I really don’t think Twombly was that much of a change. Iqbal’s an entirely different matter. So far, no Ohio court has cited that decision.

]]> http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/04/a-new-look-at-12b6/comment-page-1/#comment-69657 Janet Burnside Thu, 04 Feb 2010 12:11:02 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2619#comment-69657 So far I see litigants seeking dismissals based on Twombly because they are enamored with the buzzwords about the claim being plausible, but they clearly haven't read Twombly to understand what the Court was facing there. So far I see litigants seeking dismissals based on Twombly because they are enamored with the buzzwords about the claim being plausible, but they clearly haven’t read Twombly to understand what the Court was facing there.

]]>