Comments on: Case Update http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/01/case-update-124/ Case analysis with an attitude Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:42 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Russ Bensing http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/01/case-update-124/comment-page-1/#comment-69409 Russ Bensing Mon, 01 Feb 2010 18:32:18 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2597#comment-69409 You're right. Besides, if you don't do it for each, then if the main one gets vacated (say for insufficient evidence), you don't have PRC anymore. Thanks for the catch. You’re right. Besides, if you don’t do it for each, then if the main one gets vacated (say for insufficient evidence), you don’t have PRC anymore. Thanks for the catch.

]]> By: Jim Trotter http://briefcase8.com/2010/02/01/case-update-124/comment-page-1/#comment-69403 Jim Trotter Mon, 01 Feb 2010 13:23:35 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2597#comment-69403 "6th District says that where defendant pleads to three offenses and is to receive mandatory 3-year period of post-release controls on one and discretionary 3-year periods on others, failure of court to advise defendant on each offense voids sentence for offenses he wasn’t advised about, despite fact that PRC is to be served concurrently; other courts have ruled to the contrary, and that’s probably the better result" how do you get around the syllabus langauge in bezak that says "each offense?" “6th District says that where defendant pleads to three offenses and is to receive mandatory 3-year period of post-release controls on one and discretionary 3-year periods on others, failure of court to advise defendant on each offense voids sentence for offenses he wasn’t advised about, despite fact that PRC is to be served concurrently; other courts have ruled to the contrary, and that’s probably the better result”

how do you get around the syllabus langauge in bezak that says “each offense?”

]]>