http://briefcase8.com/2010/01/07/lets-go-to-the-video-2/ Case analysis with an attitude Wed, 23 May 2012 10:52:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://briefcase8.com/2010/01/07/lets-go-to-the-video-2/comment-page-1/#comment-67919 John Spiccia Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:18:10 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2508#comment-67919 Any idea when the ruling on the intentional tort statute will come out. It's been almost a year. Any idea when the ruling on the intentional tort statute will come out. It’s been almost a year.

]]> http://briefcase8.com/2010/01/07/lets-go-to-the-video-2/comment-page-1/#comment-67412 Jim Trotter Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:48:24 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2508#comment-67412 should'nt it apply to all protected calles of people. since the basis is vindiciation of the juror's rights should’nt it apply to all protected calles of people. since the basis is vindiciation of the juror’s rights

]]> http://briefcase8.com/2010/01/07/lets-go-to-the-video-2/comment-page-1/#comment-67313 Russ Bensing Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:10:12 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2508#comment-67313 Don't think so. There was just a case holding that Batson only applied to race and gender, rejecting a claim that it applied to religious discrimination as well. But hell, the ADA (also known as the Attorney Full Employment Act of 1990) has been extended to all sorts of things, so why not this? Don’t think so. There was just a case holding that Batson only applied to race and gender, rejecting a claim that it applied to religious discrimination as well. But hell, the ADA (also known as the Attorney Full Employment Act of 1990) has been extended to all sorts of things, so why not this?

]]> http://briefcase8.com/2010/01/07/lets-go-to-the-video-2/comment-page-1/#comment-67297 Jim Trotter Thu, 07 Jan 2010 14:38:28 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/?p=2508#comment-67297 If the juror is removed can there be a Batson challenge based on violation of ADA? If the juror is removed can there be a Batson challenge based on violation of ADA?

]]>