<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A second look at Foster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/30/a-second-look-at-foster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/30/a-second-look-at-foster/</link>
	<description>Case analysis with an attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:37:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Helms</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/30/a-second-look-at-foster/comment-page-1/#comment-61764</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Helms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/?p=1860#comment-61764</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have the opinion in front of me, but what you&#039;ve written above seems to recall some of the same logic espoused in the 8th Districts&#039;s en banc opinion in State v. Lett (or Letts?).  Then again, my recollection may be wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have the opinion in front of me, but what you&#8217;ve written above seems to recall some of the same logic espoused in the 8th Districts&#8217;s en banc opinion in State v. Lett (or Letts?).  Then again, my recollection may be wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
