<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s up in the 8th</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/07/whats-up-in-the-8th-31/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/07/whats-up-in-the-8th-31/</link>
	<description>Case analysis with an attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 14:51:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Gamso</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/07/07/whats-up-in-the-8th-31/comment-page-1/#comment-60746</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Gamso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 12:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/?p=1761#comment-60746</guid>
		<description>For your future note on how courts handle expletives:

In oral argument at SCOTUS in FCC v. Fox Television Stations (the fleeting expletives case) nobody used one.  Ginsburg revealed later that court staff had admonished counsel that use of the terms might be considered inappropriate by some of the justices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your future note on how courts handle expletives:</p>
<p>In oral argument at SCOTUS in FCC v. Fox Television Stations (the fleeting expletives case) nobody used one.  Ginsburg revealed later that court staff had admonished counsel that use of the terms might be considered inappropriate by some of the justices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

