Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

Other than the judicial campaign contribution case I discussed on Friday, the big news out of DC was something the Supreme Court didn't do:  it refused to hear the appeal from the Chrysler deal.  The Court's got two weeks left, although if you want to get a jump on the eventual analyses, you can take a look at the StatPack compiled by the gang over at SCOTUSBlog.  Some wags have suggested that we are a nation ruled by Anthony Kennedy, and they'd get some support for that observation from events so far:  Kennedy has voted with the majority in 92% of the divided cases, and only once in the 16 cases which wound up 5-4 has he been in the minority:  Arizona v. Gant.

Closer to home, in Lima v. State, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the elimination of residency restrictions for municipal employees, which will either be the end of life as we know it for the cities, or no big deal.  I live in one of the three areas of Cleveland most likely to be affected, so I'm sort of the canary in the coal mine on that one.  The other big case was State v. Bloomer, which dealt with the legislature's latest attempt to clean up how judges impose post-release controls.  I'll talk about that on Wednesday.

On to the courts of appeals...

Civil.  1st District holds that maintaining a water line is a proprietary function, city not entitled to sovereign immunity for failing to repair break and allowing ice to form on roadway... 2nd District affirms holding that father's consent to adoption was required; ten-minute phone call with child was suffiicient to prove communication within one year, especially where  mother had significantly discouraged communications... 11th District says failure to file answer is neglect, but in absence of any explanation of facts, neglect is not excusable and does not warrant vacating judgment... Court can't order production of documents without a hearing where other party claims they're protected by attorney-client and work-product privilege, 8th District holds... Where client did not object to reasonableness of attorney fees when he was billed for them, law firm did not have to present expert testimony on reasonableness in lawsuit to recover them, says 10th District...

Criminal.  Defendant may not argue disproportionate sentence solely on basis that he received longer sentence than his codefendants, 6th District rules... Even though defendant convicted of attempted rape and not rape, expungement was precluded, says 7th District... Felony murder based on child endangering not allied offense with child endangering, even where based on same acts, says 1st District... Fact that public defender representing defendant had also represented key prosecution witness not conflict of interest necessitating reversal, says 6th District... 2nd District vacates juvenile plea, says that juvenile wasn't counseled by parents or guardian ad litem, not advised of right to counsel at disposition...

Sticks and stones will hurt my bones... In State v. Bethay, the 1st District rejects a Batson challenge where

the prosecutor explained the challenge by stating that a member of the prospective juror's family had been charged with murder and that the prospective juror had "made faces" when informed that it was an aggravated-murder trial.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States
  • June 27, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A worrisome decision on expert funding, and, mirabile dictu, a court's dismissal of a case for a discovery violation is upheld