<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday Roundup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefcase8.com/2009/02/20/friday-roundup-26/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/02/20/friday-roundup-26/</link>
	<description>Case analysis with an attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 12:47:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overheard, one lawyer talking about another</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/02/20/friday-roundup-26/comment-page-1/#comment-53216</link>
		<dc:creator>Overheard, one lawyer talking about another</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/?p=1202#comment-53216</guid>
		<description>[...] “He lies so much he had to hire someone to call his dog.” [Ohio blog The Briefcase] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] “He lies so much he had to hire someone to call his dog.” [Ohio blog The Briefcase] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill bridge</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/02/20/friday-roundup-26/comment-page-1/#comment-46646</link>
		<dc:creator>bill bridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 15:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/?p=1202#comment-46646</guid>
		<description>i hereby withdraw my previous post concerning censorship in this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hereby withdraw my previous post concerning censorship in this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill bridge</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2009/02/20/friday-roundup-26/comment-page-1/#comment-46553</link>
		<dc:creator>bill bridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 00:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/?p=1202#comment-46553</guid>
		<description>Can lawyers be informants against their own clients?  It seems that is the case in the CitySide Wholesale raid.  See PD Article 2-16-09.  According to the search warrant affidavit some attorney called the US Attorney&#039;s Office and told the prosecutor about all the details of his clients illegal transactions???  Maybe the FBI pays better than the client?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can lawyers be informants against their own clients?  It seems that is the case in the CitySide Wholesale raid.  See PD Article 2-16-09.  According to the search warrant affidavit some attorney called the US Attorney&#8217;s Office and told the prosecutor about all the details of his clients illegal transactions???  Maybe the FBI pays better than the client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

