Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • Friday roundup – Go west
  • Jurors with disabilities
  • A new look at sentencing?
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Friday Roundup
  • Guns, guns, guns
  • Solving Miranda
  • What’s up in the 8th
  • Case Update


  • Archives

  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Friday Roundup

    February 20th, 2009

    Mind games.  I’ve mentioned judges sentencing on acquitted conduct before — enhancing a sentence based on conduct the defendant had never been charged with, or had even been acquitted of, but a Federal judge in Illinois went one better:  he increased the sentence based on a finding that if the defendant had been out on bail, he would have tried to murder someone.  The 7th Circuit decides that’s just a bit too over the top, and reverses

    Overheard.  Line of the week, one lawyer talking about another lawyer:  “He lies so much he had to hire someone to call his dog.”

    Overload.  Several Ohio Supreme Court justices have implored the General Assembly to do something about sentencing in Ohio.  Now the plea comes from another source:  the Ohio prisons chief:

    Ohio’s prisons director says unless sentencing guidelines are changed, the state’s inmate population will reach 60,000 within a decade.

    Ohio prisons are at 132 percent capacity with 50,719 inmates. Collins told lawmakers that without changes, Ohio would have to spend about $1 billion by 2018 to build extra space for the increased number of inmates.

    Overpaid?  Snaps to my main man Chief Justice Tom Moyer, who managed to guide the Ohio Supreme Court through the year at $1.5 million under budget, according to this press release.  Good news for bad times; the cratering economy has caused even Moyer’s USSC counterpart, Chief Justice Roberts, to tone down his annual plea for more money for judicial salaries.  This may not merely reflect sentimentality toward the four million people who’ve lost their jobs over the past year; as the article notes, there’s not exactly a paucity of people willing to take a job which allows them to retire after fifteen years at full salary for life.  Plus, as this article notes, recent research questions whether judges are really leaving the bench because of the low salaries, and also indicates that salaries don’t have much relationship to judicial performance. 

    Of course, some judges find unusual ways to augment their incomes;  as this article relates, two juvenile judges in Pennsylvania did so by getting kickbacks for sentencing kids to two privately run youth detention centers.

    Overstressed.  Of course, judges aren’t the only members of the legal profession feeling the economic pinch.  $1000 per hour billing rates appear on the way out, and in fact there’s some question of whether the billable hour will even survive.  The market for those coming out of law school is pretty grim, with jobs in the legal sector down over 1% since a year ago.  This prompted the local fishwrap to write a story on depression in lawyers.  I started to read it, but it bummed me out so much I couldn’t finish it.

    3 Responses to “Friday Roundup”

    1. bill bridge Says:

      Can lawyers be informants against their own clients? It seems that is the case in the CitySide Wholesale raid. See PD Article 2-16-09. According to the search warrant affidavit some attorney called the US Attorney’s Office and told the prosecutor about all the details of his clients illegal transactions??? Maybe the FBI pays better than the client?

    2. bill bridge Says:

      i hereby withdraw my previous post concerning censorship in this post.

    3. Overheard, one lawyer talking about another Says:

      [...] “He lies so much he had to hire someone to call his dog.” [Ohio blog The Briefcase] [...]

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    General Division
    Domestic Relations
    Juvenile
    Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Supreme Court
    Geauga Common Pleas
    Lake Common Pleas
    Lorain Common Pleas
    Summit Common Pleas

    Links to all Ohio Courts

    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    Supreme Court
    6th Circuit
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Concurring Opinions
    Simple Justice
    A Public Defender
    Defending People
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Lowering the Bar
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    Snitching Blog
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Legal Blogwatch
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Jeff Gamso's Blog
    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Bullseye Blog (PI law)
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    Ohio Employment Law Blog
    Ohio Practical Business Law
    Ohio Environmental Law Blog
    Other Ohio law blogs


    Criminal Defense Bars

    Ohio (OACDL)
    Cuyahoga County (CCDLA)
    National (NACDL)


    Legal Discussion Forum

    Attorneys Forum - Legal Help and Law Discussion Forums.


    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs