Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • The 8th, the 5th, and the 6th
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Good days, bad days
  • Can I get a [expert] witness?
  • A new rule of law? Not quite
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Case Update
  • Back to the Future


  • Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Case Update

    February 16th, 2009

    The only news from DC is good news — the latest update on Justice Ginsberg’s cancer surgery, which found no metastasis.  Not a whole lot going on downstate, either.  If you’re thinking of becoming a lawyer, go light on the gas pedal:  the Supreme Court disapproves a bar applicant because of, among other things, sixteen speeding tickets, four of them incurred after he’d filed his registration application.  Then again, those “other things” included convictions for assault, disorderly conduct, and underage consumption of alcohol.  On the bright side, if he passes the bar exam in 2010, he’ll be able to set up a boutique practice in traffic law.

    Other than that, and a few mundane disciplinary cases, the only decision of note was In re Burt, which involved a juvenile who’d been adjudicated of being delinquent, with the trial court ordering her to be good at school and home.  She wasn’t, so another delinquency case was filed against her, this time for violating the previous court order.  She claimed that it should have been treated as a probation violation of the first case, but the court says no, it can be handled as a new delinquency complaint, too. 

    In the courts of appeals…

    Civil.  10th District says that RC 2305.15, which tolls limitations for period defendant conceals himself or is out of state, doesn’t apply to extend refiling under savings statute or time to get service under CivR 3(A)… 8th District affirms summary judgment for employers in two intentional tort cases, one involving co-employee’s aggressive driving, and another involving assault by nursing home resident on health care aide… Trial court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing before denying builder’s motion for stay pending arbitration, says 9th District… 5th District reiterates that journal entry stating merely “defendant has been convicted” not final, appealable order; must state manner of conviction (plea, jury finding, etc.)…

    Criminal.  10th District reiterates that Colon is applied prospectively, can’t be used for defendants whose cases had become final prior to its announcement… 8th District says that defendant’s motion to withdraw plea was res judicata by virtue of a previous motion for delayed appeal, which the court had denied… 9th District says that defendant’s motion to correct his sentence, filed 8 years later, has to be treated as petition for post-conviction relief, is untimely; whatever happened to sentence being “void”?… 12th District affirms perjury conviction based on giving false information to obtain civil protection order… 3rd District says trial court erred in finding defendant established need for disclosure of grand jury transcripts, says potentially inconsistent testimony and lack of evidence not sufficient reasons… 5th District kicks out about five cases, including this one, for lack of final appealable order:  judgment entry can’t simply say “defendant has been convicted,” must give manner of conviction (guilty plea, finding by jury, etc.)

    Bullshit traffic stop of the week.  The 12th District, in State v. Dixon, affirms the denial of a motion to suppress where the officer had initiated a traffic stop because the defendant had failed to put on her turn signal before turning into her driveway.

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    General Division
    Domestic Relations
    Juvenile
    Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Supreme Court
    Geauga Common Pleas
    Lake Common Pleas
    Lorain Common Pleas
    Summit Common Pleas

    Links to all Ohio Courts

    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    Supreme Court
    6th Circuit
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Concurring Opinions
    Simple Justice
    A Public Defender
    Defending People
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Lowering the Bar
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    Snitching Blog
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Legal Blogwatch
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Jeff Gamso's Blog
    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Bullseye Blog (PI law)
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    Ohio Employment Law Blog
    Ohio Practical Business Law
    Ohio Environmental Law Blog
    Other Ohio law blogs


    Criminal Defense Bars

    Ohio (OACDL)
    Cuyahoga County (CCDLA)
    National (NACDL)


    Legal Discussion Forum

    Attorneys Forum - Legal Help and Law Discussion Forums.


    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs