Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

In addition to the handing down two big decisions in Herring v. US and Oregon v. Ice, which we talked about the last couple days, the US Supreme Court's granted cert in five cases, including one on student privacy, where a thirteen-year-old girl was strip-searched on the basis of an unproven tip from another statement, and an Ohio death penalty case.  Kent Scheidegger over at Crime and Consequences has a good, if slightly biased, post about the latter case.  Speaking of capital punishment, last year the death penalty was imposed in Ohio in only three cases, the lowest number since the penalty was reinstated in 1981.  On the flip side of that coin, Ohio was the only non-Southern state to execute anyone last year.

Closer to home, nothing from the gang down in Columbus, who are apparently girding their loins, individually or collectively, for the oral argument this week in Lima v. State and State v. Akron, involving the question of whether the statute forbidding municipalities from requiring employees to live within the city limits violates the Home Rule amendment. 

The highlights from the courts of appeals, in which civil, and especially domestic, cases predominate...

Civil.  8th District affirms that where parties' combined income exceeds $150,000, court has virtually unbridled discretion in determining amount of child support... 12th District affirms overruling of wife's motion to continue divorce trial, where she fired 2nd attorney two days before trial... 3rd District reverses grant of summary judgment in employer intentional tort case involving asbestos; excellent discussion of how materials supporting grant or denial can be presented in compliance with CivR 56(C)... 12th District affirms trial court's determination that wife was guilty of financial misconduct related to her gambling; she'd made ATM withdrawals of over $225,000 from various casinos... 9th District affirms trial court's termination of spousal support based on wife's cohabitation...

Criminal.  5th District says that destruction of urine sample in OVI case doesn't violate defendant's rights, where defendant had given breath sample... Although physical control was substantially equivalent offense to OVI under former law, it's not under current law because OVI requires movement of the vehicle, and physical control does not, 8th District holds, can't be used to elevate degree of offense... 3rd District rejects claim that, where defendant sentenced for multiple offenses, trial court must impose post-release controls for each one... 8th District says that appellate court will not engage in proportionality review in sentencing unless defendant raises issue, presents some evidence on it, in trial court...

Picky, picky, picky.  Plaintiff's counsel shows up for a hearing to confirm an arbitration award.  Problem:  the attorney isn't the one who signed the pleadings, but is instead another attorney from the same firm.  Why should that be a problem?  Good question, but it is for this judge, who dismisses the case with prejudice for failure to prosecute because no formal substitution of appearance was filed.

Seems I remember something about the preference for cases being decided on their merits, rather than on hypertechnicalities.  The 3rd District does, too, and in FIA Card Servs. v. Salmon, reverses the decision and joins several other districts which have held that there's no problem with different attorneys from the same firm appearing as substitute counsel.

Search

Recent Entries

  • May 25, 2017
    "Clarifying" post-release controls
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Grimes
  • May 23, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Allied offenses, and two search cases
  • May 23, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Allied offenses, and two search cases
  • May 22, 2017
    Case Update
    Is SCOTUS looking for a forfeiture case? Plus, appellate decisions on expungement and restitution, plain error, and what a judge has to tell a defendant about sex registration
  • May 19, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part II
    Decisions on lineups and prior calculation and design, and two out of eight (eight!) pro se defendants come up winners,
  • May 17, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part I
    Taking a first look at some of the 8th District's decisions over the past two weeks
  • May 16, 2017
    Case Update
    Stock tips, Federal sentencing reform goes dormant, schoolbag searches, and the retroactivity of State v. Hand
  • May 8, 2017
    Case Update
    Death in Arkansas, a worrisome disciplinary decision, and appellate cases on speedy trial, arson registration, use of prior testimony, and the futility of post-conviction relief
  • May 2, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Nothing but sex
  • May 1, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS closes out oral argument for the Term, the Ohio Supreme Court has seven of them this week, and we report on a decision where you'll probably want to play Paul Simon's "Still Crazy After All These Years" in the background while you read about it