Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Friday Roundup

Guess he'll learn what a tight end really is.  Seems that Giants wide receiver Plaxico Burress' biggest problem isn't that he (a) shot himself in the leg, thus (b) getting a four-game suspension which will cost him over a million dollars, and (c) putting in jeopardy the $35 million contract he signed at the start of the season, under which he's still due $27 million.  No, the correct answer is: (d) he looking at 3 1/2 years in prison.  As this article notes, last year, at the urging of New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, the state legislature passed a law making that the minimum mandatory penalty for illegal possession of a loaded weapon.

Plaxico might not be going down alone, though.  Turns out the doctor who treated Plaxico was mysteriously summoned to the hospital, and then signed off on medical papers which identified Burress by a phony name.  As they say on the news, police are investigating.

A pound of flesh.  From time to time, I'll mention some bullshit lawsuit, like this one, which often gets me a mention at Overlawyered, which keeps track of that stuff.  It's not just the ambulance chasers who give us a bad name, though.  As everybody knows, the Recording Industry Association of America has been suing people left and right for downloading music, some 20,000 at last count.  The latest addition to that count is 19-year-old Ciara Suaro, who's disabled from pancreatitis and is hospitalized weekly.  The RIAA got a default judgment against her for $8,000 alleging that she downloaded ten songs.  She and her mother claim she didn't, and say that the internet address the songs were downloaded at was one opened by her father after he moved out.

I've represented some really scuzzy people in my time, but I'd take a job at McDonald's before I'd work for the RIAA filing lawsuits like that.

Then again... Speaking of Overlawyered, they direct us to the news that a father and son who were customers at the Wal-Mart Stampede on Black Friday, which resulted in the trampling death of a store security guard, are themselves claiming to have been injured in the melee.  They're seeking a meager $2 million to compensate them for the neck and back pain they suffered.  The lawyer for the pair was one Kenneth Mollins, and Popehat chronicled some of his previous lawsuits, including this one:

Mollins appeared on CNN in July 2007 after filing a suit on behalf of a woman, Francine Dorf, who sued Con Ed over the steam pipe eruption in Manhattan that month. Dorf wasn't injured: she just complained that the loud sound reminded her of September 11, entitling her to damages, in part because she could not "focus enough to read the romance novels that she checked out from the library."

And now, a service to our readers.  If you do criminal law in Federal court, you'll want to know that the criminal rules have been amended.  You can find the amendments here, and an explanation of the changes here.  Most of them provide for expanded rights of victims.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States