<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what to do with Heller?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/</link>
	<description>Case analysis with an attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: toby troyer</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/comment-page-1/#comment-42442</link>
		<dc:creator>toby troyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/#comment-42442</guid>
		<description>girlfriend stole guns to buy oxycotin or heroin not sure witch but should she be charged with manditory ohio gun specs charges</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>girlfriend stole guns to buy oxycotin or heroin not sure witch but should she be charged with manditory ohio gun specs charges</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Briefcase &#187; Friday Roundup</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/comment-page-1/#comment-41719</link>
		<dc:creator>The Briefcase &#187; Friday Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/#comment-41719</guid>
		<description>[...] The Post-Heller landscape.  I&#8217;d written a number of posts (here and here) suggesting that the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision last June in District of Columbia v. Heller could have some major ramifications on criminal law.  My argument was that the Court, by establishing a fundamental right to bear arms, had opened the door to claims that weapons disability laws, and even gun specifications, in some cases weren&#8217;t based on a sufficient showing of a compelling governmental interest to pass constitutional muster.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Post-Heller landscape.  I&#8217;d written a number of posts (here and here) suggesting that the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision last June in District of Columbia v. Heller could have some major ramifications on criminal law.  My argument was that the Court, by establishing a fundamental right to bear arms, had opened the door to claims that weapons disability laws, and even gun specifications, in some cases weren&#8217;t based on a sufficient showing of a compelling governmental interest to pass constitutional muster.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Briefcase &#187; Friday Roundup</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/comment-page-1/#comment-38936</link>
		<dc:creator>The Briefcase &#187; Friday Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/07/02/so-what-to-do-with-heller/#comment-38936</guid>
		<description>[...] More on Heller.  Many commentators, yours truly included, have suggested that the Court&#8217;s decision in Heller raises some questions about the validity of some gun laws, like those prohibiting possession by ex-felons, or even, in certain cases, the 1-year firearm specification under Ohio law.  Former Solicitor General Ted Olson chimed in with his opinion that &#8220;the Court might decide there are some classes of felons that ought to be treated differently from other classes of felons&#8221; in an interview in this article.  And Prof. Berman points to some other questions, like whether a defendant who&#8217;s pleading to a felony needs to be advised that he&#8217;s giving up his constitutional right to have a gun. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More on Heller.  Many commentators, yours truly included, have suggested that the Court&#8217;s decision in Heller raises some questions about the validity of some gun laws, like those prohibiting possession by ex-felons, or even, in certain cases, the 1-year firearm specification under Ohio law.  Former Solicitor General Ted Olson chimed in with his opinion that &#8220;the Court might decide there are some classes of felons that ought to be treated differently from other classes of felons&#8221; in an interview in this article.  And Prof. Berman points to some other questions, like whether a defendant who&#8217;s pleading to a felony needs to be advised that he&#8217;s giving up his constitutional right to have a gun. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
