Subscribe


Recent Posts

  • The 8th, the 5th, and the 6th
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Good days, bad days
  • Can I get a [expert] witness?
  • A new rule of law? Not quite
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Case Update
  • Back to the Future


  • Archives

  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Case Update

    May 27th, 2008

    We’re still on standby for US Supreme Court decisions; if any come out today, we’ll have something on them later this week.  Down in Columbus, the Ohio Seven affirmed a 134-year prison sentence for a home robber, but there was an interesting concurrence; we’ll talk about that tomorrow.  There were also no fewer than three decisions on UM/UIM coverage, here, here, and here.  There was a point a year or so ago when I told myself I would someday wade into that thicket, but that day hasn’t come, and to tell you the truth, it’s not getting any nearer. 

    As for the courts of appeals, not much going on, apparently in anticipation of the holiday weekend; no opinions from the 8th District, for example.  What did come down…

    Civil.  1st District reverses grant of summary judgment agaiinst woman who fell when she sat down on bench in doctor’s office, says that notice of defect in bench isn’t necessary in negligence suit when defendant or its agent constructed bench… 10th District upholds award of $77,000 in sanctions against attorneys for frivolous conduct; suit was filed (twice), with no evidentiary basis… 3rd District notes that plaintiff who rescinds contract under Consumer Sales Practices Act not entitled to damages, too…

    Criminal.  Where defendant shot two people, felonious assault under causing serious physical harm and felonious assault under causing physical harm with deadly weapon should have merged, says 1st District; also holds that aggravated robbery with a gun and robbery while “attempting to inflict physical harm” merge, too… Trial court didn’t err in not declaring mistrial after co-defendant entered plea, where jury wasn’t told of plea, says 6th District… 10th District holds that counsel’s telling defendant he would be eligible for judicial release, when he wouldn’t be, doesn’t require vacating plea… 12th District says that BCI lab report on drugs not testimonial under Crawford… 9th District says that if conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, it’s necessarily supported by sufficient evidence…

    If a husband and wife get divorced in Tennessee, are they still brother and sister?  If you’re charged with attempted rape for going into your niece’s room at 4:00 AM, undressing her, and starting to fondle her, it’s probably not a good idea to do what the defendant did in State v. Thompson:

    During the investigation, appellant spontaneously volunteered to one of the responding officers that he did not understand why a big deal was being made since the girl was 13, and he could take her to Kentucky or Tennessee and marry her.

    The girl was actually 11.  Somehow, I don’t think that would have made a difference.  “Hey, 13, that’s one thing.  But 11?  What do you think I am, a pervert?”

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    General Division
    Domestic Relations
    Juvenile
    Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Supreme Court
    Geauga Common Pleas
    Lake Common Pleas
    Lorain Common Pleas
    Summit Common Pleas

    Links to all Ohio Courts

    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    Supreme Court
    6th Circuit
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Concurring Opinions
    Simple Justice
    A Public Defender
    Defending People
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Lowering the Bar
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    Snitching Blog
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Legal Blogwatch
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Jeff Gamso's Blog
    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Bullseye Blog (PI law)
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    Ohio Employment Law Blog
    Ohio Practical Business Law
    Ohio Environmental Law Blog
    Other Ohio law blogs


    Criminal Defense Bars

    Ohio (OACDL)
    Cuyahoga County (CCDLA)
    National (NACDL)


    Legal Discussion Forum

    Attorneys Forum - Legal Help and Law Discussion Forums.


    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs