Recent Posts

  • Friday Roundup
  • Once bitten, twice shy
  • False confessions
  • Case Update - Back in the Saddle Edition
  • Reconsidering Colon
  • Just chillin’…
  • Max Consec
  • The Feds come calling
  • Case Update
  • Friday Roundup


  • Categories

  • Civil
  • Criminal
  • Constitutional
  • Potpourri
  • Rants


  • Archives

  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Friday Roundup

    May 16th, 2008

    And yo momma’s fat, too.  From the transcript of a Michigan magistrate’s sentencing of a 20-year-old defendant for being a minor in possession of alcohol:

    “I don’t mean to be offensive, but you have two Operating While Intoxicated convictions and then you blow a .223 and you’re still not 21? Here is my suggestion to you, Mr. Dickey, climb up on the roof of your house and jump off.  Either that or get in a bathtub filled with hot water and slash your wrists; then you will be dead; it will be cheaper; it will be faster and in the long run it will be less painful to anybody who cares about you.”

    The article reporting the story notes that the magistrate had “second thoughts” about her comments.  Good thing she didn’t mean to be offensive, huh?

    A no-class action.  You hear the stories all the time about class-action lawsuits, which wind up in a settlement where the lawyers get $20 million in fees and each plaintiff gets a $25 coupon good for the next time they shop at the defendant’s store.  The lawyers in the recent Fen-Phen case did even better:  three of them are on trial for bilking their clients out of $65 million of the $200 million settlement.  Their trial down in Kentucky, according the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog, has taken an unexpected turn:  while two of the lawyers are claiming they were misled by another attorney involved in the case, the third defendant is claiming that he “was hospitalized for an ‘alcoholic seizure’ a month after the case was settled, didn’t take part in any court hearings and was too drunk at the time to be responsible.”

    Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em.  With a hat tip to Drug War Rant, according to US government researchers, “heavy marijuana use can boost blood levels of a particular protein, perhaps raising a person’s risk of a heart attack or stroke.”  Heavy marijuana use?  Try the Jumbo Family Pack:  “The marijuana users in the study averaged smoking 78 to 350 marijuana cigarettes per week, based on self-reported drug history, the researchers said,” the Reuters story reports

    “Chronic marijuana use is not only causing people to get high, it’s actually causing long-term adverse effects in patients who use too much of the drug,” Cadet, whose study is in the journal Molecular Psychiatry, said in a telephone interview. “Chronic marijuana abuse is not so benign.”

    Well, yeah, I’m willing to accept the assertion that maybe, just maybe, smoking 50 joints of marijuana a day might not be good for you.  Now, I’m not a scientist, nor do I play one on TV, and the likelihood of an article of mine appearing in the journal Molecular Psychiatry are slightly less than my chances of being America’s Next Top Model, but I’m guessing that drinking 50 cups of coffee a day isn’t going to get a stamp of approval from the American College of Cardiology, either.

    And the discerning reader will notice that the study concluded that chronic usage would result in “perhaps raising a person’s risk of a heart attack or stroke.”  After all, “the study did not look at whether the heavy marijuana users actually had heart disease.”

    Campaign News.  Walt Bayes, Republican candidate for the Idaho House, has seized on what he believes to be a crucial issue:  the need for separate bathrooms and showers for high school students.  Not separate bathrooms and showers for boys and girls; separate bathrooms and showers for homosexuals and heterosexuals.  No word yet on whether Idaho Senator Larry “I’ve Got a Wide Stance” Craig has signed on to Baye’s crusade just yet.

    See you on Monday.

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    Common Pleas-General
    Common Pleas-Domestic
    Common Pleas-Juvenile
    Common Pleas-Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Ohio Supreme Court
    Geauga County Common Pleas
    Lake County Common Pleas
    Lorain County Common Pleas
    Summit County Common Pleas
    Links to all Ohio Courts
    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    US Supreme Court
    6th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    Appellate Law & Practice
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Confrontation Blog
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    A Stitch in Haste
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Ohio Personal Injury Lawyer
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    OACDL
    CCDLA

    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs