Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

Today's menu features Virginia v. Gray, a notable US Supreme Court decision on search and seizure, which I'll discuss in more detail tomorrow.  Closer to home, their Ohio counterparts handed down Columbus v. Kim, upholding that city's noise ordinance against a claim of unconstitutionality, concluding that whatever one's standards of "unreasonably loud" was, it was met by a dog barking for an hour and a half so loudly that it could be heard over a running lawnmower.  The court also handed down another decision in a speedy trial case, with a result that's sure to astonish you.  Yep.  Shocking, I tell you.  Shocking.  We'll talk about that on Wednesday, along with another case that came down a few weeks back.

On to the courts of appeals...

Civil.  1st District reverses judgment adopting magistrate's decision because decision was never served on opposing attorney... 6th District strikes down Ohio statute prohibiting municipalities from placing residency restrictions on employees; 9th District had previously come to same conclusion... 8th District reverses $2 million award for plaintiffs in med mal action, good discussion of loss of life expectancy and "loss of chance" theory... 9th District affirms grant of summary judgment to insurance company, holds it had no duty to defend lawsuit against insured barowners who sold liquor to minor, says laches requires prejudice, not just delay...

Criminal.  1st District says that misstatement as to maximum sentence at time of plea not error because no prejudice, where defendant receives sentence within statutory range... Where defendant and state sign plea agreement recommending "a one year sentence with judicial release after 3 months," judge not bound to give judicial release, says 10th District, defendant not entitled to vacate plea... Where police come to defendant's house, ask him to come their car, and question him regarding allegations of sex abuse of his daughter, defendant not in custody for purposes of Miranda, 12th District holds... Defendant files motion to dismiss escape charge because he wasn't placed on PRC, court denies it, defendant pleads no contest and appeals; 9th District says issue not preserved for review, since motion to dismiss on factual basis not appropriate in criminal cases...

Bullshit non-traffic stop of the week.  Police stop defendant for "suspicion of jaywalking," question him, 1st District says it's not a custodial interrogation, reverses grant of motion to suppress.  Opinion refers to several other jaywalking cases, also one where defendant was stopped for "suspicion of excessive window tinting."  No, I'm not making that up...

Search

Recent Entries

  • March 20, 2017
    Taking time off
    I'm taking the week off. Have a major brief due on Thursday, plus a trial in Federal court starting next Monday. Plus, I'm pretty sure that Obama wiretapped me, too, so I'm working on getting to the bottom of that....
  • March 17, 2017
    What's Up with the 8th?
    The 8th District cases come out every Thursday. By about ten o'clock in the morning, the court will have posted the "weekly decision list" on its web site. It will give a summary of the case, usually in a sentence...
  • March 14, 2017
    Rippo and Pena-Rodriguez
    SCOTUS issues decisions on judicial recusal and biased jurors
  • March 13, 2017
    Case Update
    A SCOTUS decision on career offenders, and appellate cases on what a judge can consider in sentencing, and untimely motions to suppress
  • March 9, 2017
    A switch in time
    The court reverses itself in Gonzalez
  • March 8, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    More sentencing stories, and the right way to handle an Anders brief
  • March 7, 2017
    Case Update
    Knock and announce and the Ohio Constitution, and Anders briefs.
  • March 6, 2017
    Never mind
    The Ohio Supreme Court reverses Gonzalez.
  • March 2, 2017
    Of bright lines and bookbags
    Oral argument in State v. Oles and State v. Polk
  • February 28, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A good outcome in a search case, probably a good outcome (to be) in a drug case, and a very bad outcome in a child rape case