Comments on: Case Update http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/21/case-update-46/ Case analysis with an attitude Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:49:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Peter Sackett http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/21/case-update-46/comment-page-1/#comment-37462 Peter Sackett Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:20:41 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/21/case-update-46/#comment-37462 You mention the Castle doctrine. It should be the Hooper Williford doctrine. I tried that case a long time ago. I was the one that asked Judge Basil Russo for the instruction....he said no....the Ohio S.C. said yes.....and the rest in history. I didn't handle the appeals. Hooper spent 12 months in jail. His second trial was not guilty. Thanks, as always, PAS. You mention the Castle doctrine. It should be the Hooper Williford doctrine. I tried that case a long time ago. I was the one that asked Judge Basil Russo for the instruction….he said no….the Ohio S.C. said yes…..and the rest in history. I didn’t handle the appeals. Hooper spent 12 months in jail. His second trial was not guilty.

Thanks, as always, PAS.

]]>