<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vindictiveness and resentencing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/17/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/17/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/</link>
	<description>Case analysis with an attitude</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:34:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Russ Bensing</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/17/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/comment-page-1/#comment-37363</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Bensing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/16/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/#comment-37363</guid>
		<description>I noticed the date discrepancy, too, so after your comment I went and checked.  Your right, it was a delayed appeal.  Main issue were the alleged failure of the judge to properly instruct the jury on complicity.  She&#039;d also appealed the consecutive sentences (this was pre-Foster, of course) on the grounds that the court hadn&#039;t stated a sufficient justification for them.  Somewhat interestingly, the court noted that she could have gotten 133 years, &quot;yet the [trial] court opted to order her to serve only 39 years.&quot;  &quot;Only...&quot;

From the details provided in the two opinions, this was certainly a frightening crime; she and her brother robbed a jewelry store at gunpoint, and she told her brother to kill the people in the store so there wouldn&#039;t be any witnesses (he obviously didn&#039;t).  Still, in light of what she&#039;s done with her time in prison, I&#039;m not sure how we&#039;re better off that she&#039;s going to be there for another 30 years, until she&#039;s 58.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed the date discrepancy, too, so after your comment I went and checked.  Your right, it was a delayed appeal.  Main issue were the alleged failure of the judge to properly instruct the jury on complicity.  She&#8217;d also appealed the consecutive sentences (this was pre-Foster, of course) on the grounds that the court hadn&#8217;t stated a sufficient justification for them.  Somewhat interestingly, the court noted that she could have gotten 133 years, &#8220;yet the [trial] court opted to order her to serve only 39 years.&#8221;  &#8220;Only&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>From the details provided in the two opinions, this was certainly a frightening crime; she and her brother robbed a jewelry store at gunpoint, and she told her brother to kill the people in the store so there wouldn&#8217;t be any witnesses (he obviously didn&#8217;t).  Still, in light of what she&#8217;s done with her time in prison, I&#8217;m not sure how we&#8217;re better off that she&#8217;s going to be there for another 30 years, until she&#8217;s 58.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Helms</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/17/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/comment-page-1/#comment-37360</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Helms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/16/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/#comment-37360</guid>
		<description>Sorry, all the male references in the last comment should have been female.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, all the male references in the last comment should have been female.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Helms</title>
		<link>http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/17/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/comment-page-1/#comment-37359</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Helms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 11:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://briefcase8.com/2008/04/16/vindictiveness-and-resentencing/#comment-37359</guid>
		<description>As an aside, did you notice that he was sentenced in 1998, but the appellate court affirmed his appeal in 2004.  Presumably that means he was granted a delayed appeal (because there&#039;s no indication that this was a re-opened appeal pursuant to App.R. 26, and sentencing errors are typically not proper for petitions for post-conviction relief).  Given the timeframe involved, I would think a delayed appeal would&#039;ve been filed at some point in late 2003 or early 2004.  Considering the fact that delayed appeals aren&#039;t granted frequently, I&#039;d be interested in knowing what he said in the motion that convinced the court of appeals to grant him a delayed appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an aside, did you notice that he was sentenced in 1998, but the appellate court affirmed his appeal in 2004.  Presumably that means he was granted a delayed appeal (because there&#8217;s no indication that this was a re-opened appeal pursuant to App.R. 26, and sentencing errors are typically not proper for petitions for post-conviction relief).  Given the timeframe involved, I would think a delayed appeal would&#8217;ve been filed at some point in late 2003 or early 2004.  Considering the fact that delayed appeals aren&#8217;t granted frequently, I&#8217;d be interested in knowing what he said in the motion that convinced the court of appeals to grant him a delayed appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
