Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Mailing it in

Got work to do, so let's throw out some stuff I ran across:

Well, no, it doesn't always stay in Vegas.  With a hat tip to Overlawyered comes this story of Arelia Taveras, an up-and-coming New York lawyer -- she'd worked on the 9/11 lawsuits -- whose career crashed upon revelations that she'd stolen about $100,000 from various clients to feed her gambling addiction.  As I've mentioned before, we lawyers don't exactly overexert ourselves preaching personal responsibility -- telling  a potential client that it's his own damned fault for putting his hand into a running lawnmower isn't going to put food on anyone's table -- and Taveras isn't an exception to that:  she's suing the casinos in Atlantic City and Las Vegas for $20 million, claiming that they should have known of her addiction and cut her off. 

"They knew I was going for days without eating or sleeping," Taveras, 37, said. "I would pass out at the tables. They had a duty of care to me."

Yeah, I mean, it's not like it's her fault or anything.

The War on Candy.  New Haven residents can sleep easier tonight.  Despite being an honors student, 8th-grader Michael Sheridan was stripped of his class vice-presidency and suspended for three days for buying (pick one:  heroin/marijuana/ritalin/none of the above) at school.

The answer?  None of the above.  He bought a little bag of Skittles.  It turns out that candy sales in school were banned five years ago, this story tells us, "as part of a districtwide school wellness policy."

The most pathetic part of the article is this line:  "[Sheridan] says he didn't realize his candy purchase was against the rules, but he did notice the student selling the Skittles on Feb. 26 was being secretive."  No wonder she was being secretive.  If he got a three-day suspension (later reduced to one) for buying candy, what did the seller get?  Probably this.

You know, we baby boomers look at what goes on in schools nowadays and like to say, "If I'd come home and told my dad I'd done something like that, he'd have beaten the tar out of me."  Well, that's true, but on the other hand, I imagine if I'd come home and told him I'd been suspended for buying a bag of candy in school, he might have gone up there and beaten the tar out of the principal.  And rightly so.  This is just nuts.

Reasons you don't want to go to jail:  "Compassion" isn't part of the skill set that they're looking for in corrections officers.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R1k-wMFiYs8&feature=related[/youtube]

Search

Recent Entries

  • August 15, 2017
    Summer Break
    Got a bunch of stuff to do over the next couple weeks, and with the slowdown in the courts, it's a good time to take a break. I'll be back here on August 28. See you then....
  • August 11, 2017
    Friday Musings
    Drug trafficking, ADA lawsuit abuse, and e-filing
  • August 10, 2017
    Case Update
    Waiting on SCOTUS; two Ohio Supreme Court decisions
  • August 7, 2017
    Two on allied offenses
    A look at the 8th District's latest decisions on allied offenses
  • August 3, 2017
    Thursday Ruminations
    Computerized sentencing, lawyer ads, and songs from the past
  • August 1, 2017
    8th District Roundup
    One thing that doing this blog has taught me is how much the law changes. The US Supreme Court's decisions in Blakely v. Washington and Crawford v. Washington have dramatically altered the right to jury trial and confrontation, respectively. The...
  • July 28, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    The better part of discretion
  • July 26, 2017
    Supreme Court Recap - 2016 Term
    My annual review of the Supreme Court decisions from the past term
  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture