Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »


Case Update

Nothing happening in Columbus.  I'll have a post on some key cases in the US Supreme Court on Thursday.  Meanwhile, on to the courts of appeals:

Criminal.  Good case on protective sweeps:  defendant was holed up in house, held police at bay for three hours before surrendering, cops do a sweep after that, 2nd District reverses because there was no reason to believe anyone else was on the premises... 6th District says that two black eyes, broken nose cartilage, and being knocked unconscious constitutes "serious physical harm" for felonious assault; well, yeah... 8th District rules that defendant's robbing, kidnapping, and murder of store employees were three separate acts; three separate firearms specifications didn't merge... 8th also holds that breaking and entering ("trespass with purpose to commit a felony") is not lesser included offense of 4th degree burglary ("trespass in habitation where person likely to be present... 9th affirms suppression of evidence, says that anonymous tip of woman being held by man with gun in apartment wasn't sufficient to satisfy "emergency" exception of warrant requirement where there was nothing which corroborated tip... 3rd District affirms dismissal of indictment for sexual battery, says indictment based on "in loco parentis" theory must set forth some facts supporting that theory...

Civil.  6th District says that where business credit contract provided for award of "reasonable attorney fees" in case of non-payment, trial court erred in not awarding them... 8th District affirms grant of preliminary injunction for violation of non-compete clause... 5th District holds that trial court erred by awarding damages on default judgment without holding a hearing... Does the tolling statute, which tolls limitations period while defendant is out of state, apply to savings statute, which allows plaintiff to refile complaint within one year after non-merits dismissal?  No, says 3rd District...

Finally, in a very short opinion, the 2nd District reverses a conviction for violating a protection order where the defendant called his ex-wife's house and left a voicemail message for his son.  Despite fact that the order barred the defendant from calling the ex-wife's house, the court says that the son wasn't a "protected party" under the order.  A more likely explanation for the outcome was appellate court nullification:  they just thought it was a bullshit charge.  And they're probably right.


Recent Entries

  • August 15, 2017
    Summer Break
    Got a bunch of stuff to do over the next couple weeks, and with the slowdown in the courts, it's a good time to take a break. I'll be back here on August 28. See you then....
  • August 11, 2017
    Friday Musings
    Drug trafficking, ADA lawsuit abuse, and e-filing
  • August 10, 2017
    Case Update
    Waiting on SCOTUS; two Ohio Supreme Court decisions
  • August 7, 2017
    Two on allied offenses
    A look at the 8th District's latest decisions on allied offenses
  • August 3, 2017
    Thursday Ruminations
    Computerized sentencing, lawyer ads, and songs from the past
  • August 1, 2017
    8th District Roundup
    One thing that doing this blog has taught me is how much the law changes. The US Supreme Court's decisions in Blakely v. Washington and Crawford v. Washington have dramatically altered the right to jury trial and confrontation, respectively. The...
  • July 28, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    The better part of discretion
  • July 26, 2017
    Supreme Court Recap - 2016 Term
    My annual review of the Supreme Court decisions from the past term
  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture