Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »


Case Update

There were a couple of significant decisions out of the Ohio Supreme Court on Thursday.  One involved the admissibility of statements by a child to doctor in a child sex abuse case, and the other dealt with the due process ramifications of the destruction of evidence by the police.  I'll talk about the first one tomorrow, and the second on Wednesday.  Meanwhile, in the courts of appeals...

In civil cases, the 6th District holds that while a plaintiff needs to prove doctor negligence in a negligent credentialing claim against the hospital, that doesn't mean the doctor has to be included in the lawsuit.  Good decision from the 8th District on attorney disqualification on grounds that he's going to be a witness.  The 8th also affirms summary judgment for an insurance company which rescinded a health insurance policy because of fraudulent statements by the insured in the application.  The 3rd District affirms grant of default judgment against nursing home for failure to provide discovery in personal injury case. 

In criminal cases, the 8th District reverses a denial of a pro se motion to vacate a plea because the trial court didn't give defendant an opportunity to address the court at all, when defendant claimed in the motion that he was pressured by his attorney into taking the deal.  The 9th District throws out a conviction for agreeing to pay a minor for sexual activity; "minor" was actually a detective (imagine that!), and court says a real minor is necessary.  Defendant is indicted in Butler County for receiving stolen property (a car), pleads out to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, then is indicted by Warren County for RSP for the same crime; 12th District says double jeopardy means you can't do that sort of thing.  D'oh!  9th District says that defendant should have been allowed to withdraw his plea to escape, since he wasn't under valid form of control -- post-release control was not included in the JE of his sentencing for crime he supposedly "escaped" from. 

Finally, courtesy of the 6th District, a primer on how to get sued for malpractice, in a personal injury case that you filed in Richland County, but was transferred to Woods County:

  1. Don't respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment
  2. Instead, file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case, but in the wrong county
  3. After the motion for summary judgment is granted, wait eleven months before filing a motion to vacate it, claiming that the dismissal in the wrong county is "excusable neglect"
  4. Don't put anything in the motion about a meritorious defense you might have had to the summary judgment

Rinse.  Repeat as necessary.


Recent Entries

  • March 20, 2017
    Taking time off
    I'm taking the week off. Have a major brief due on Thursday, plus a trial in Federal court starting next Monday. Plus, I'm pretty sure that Obama wiretapped me, too, so I'm working on getting to the bottom of that....
  • March 17, 2017
    What's Up with the 8th?
    The 8th District cases come out every Thursday. By about ten o'clock in the morning, the court will have posted the "weekly decision list" on its web site. It will give a summary of the case, usually in a sentence...
  • March 14, 2017
    Rippo and Pena-Rodriguez
    SCOTUS issues decisions on judicial recusal and biased jurors
  • March 13, 2017
    Case Update
    A SCOTUS decision on career offenders, and appellate cases on what a judge can consider in sentencing, and untimely motions to suppress
  • March 9, 2017
    A switch in time
    The court reverses itself in Gonzalez
  • March 8, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    More sentencing stories, and the right way to handle an Anders brief
  • March 7, 2017
    Case Update
    Knock and announce and the Ohio Constitution, and Anders briefs.
  • March 6, 2017
    Never mind
    The Ohio Supreme Court reverses Gonzalez.
  • March 2, 2017
    Of bright lines and bookbags
    Oral argument in State v. Oles and State v. Polk
  • February 28, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A good outcome in a search case, probably a good outcome (to be) in a drug case, and a very bad outcome in a child rape case