Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »


Case Update

There were a couple of significant decisions out of the Ohio Supreme Court on Thursday.  One involved the admissibility of statements by a child to doctor in a child sex abuse case, and the other dealt with the due process ramifications of the destruction of evidence by the police.  I'll talk about the first one tomorrow, and the second on Wednesday.  Meanwhile, in the courts of appeals...

In civil cases, the 6th District holds that while a plaintiff needs to prove doctor negligence in a negligent credentialing claim against the hospital, that doesn't mean the doctor has to be included in the lawsuit.  Good decision from the 8th District on attorney disqualification on grounds that he's going to be a witness.  The 8th also affirms summary judgment for an insurance company which rescinded a health insurance policy because of fraudulent statements by the insured in the application.  The 3rd District affirms grant of default judgment against nursing home for failure to provide discovery in personal injury case. 

In criminal cases, the 8th District reverses a denial of a pro se motion to vacate a plea because the trial court didn't give defendant an opportunity to address the court at all, when defendant claimed in the motion that he was pressured by his attorney into taking the deal.  The 9th District throws out a conviction for agreeing to pay a minor for sexual activity; "minor" was actually a detective (imagine that!), and court says a real minor is necessary.  Defendant is indicted in Butler County for receiving stolen property (a car), pleads out to unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, then is indicted by Warren County for RSP for the same crime; 12th District says double jeopardy means you can't do that sort of thing.  D'oh!  9th District says that defendant should have been allowed to withdraw his plea to escape, since he wasn't under valid form of control -- post-release control was not included in the JE of his sentencing for crime he supposedly "escaped" from. 

Finally, courtesy of the 6th District, a primer on how to get sued for malpractice, in a personal injury case that you filed in Richland County, but was transferred to Woods County:

  1. Don't respond to defendant's motion for summary judgment
  2. Instead, file a motion to voluntarily dismiss the case, but in the wrong county
  3. After the motion for summary judgment is granted, wait eleven months before filing a motion to vacate it, claiming that the dismissal in the wrong county is "excusable neglect"
  4. Don't put anything in the motion about a meritorious defense you might have had to the summary judgment

Rinse.  Repeat as necessary.


Recent Entries

  • April 26, 2017
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives
  • April 17, 2017
    Case Update
    Structural error, prejudice, and police run amok.
  • April 13, 2017
    Some arguments on sentencing
    Why oral arguments can be fun, even when they're not yours
  • April 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Oh fun: declarations against interest v. non-hearsay. Also, the difference between not guilty and innocent, and Ohio's statute penalizing the refusal to take chemical test in a DUI case goes bye-bye
  • April 11, 2017
    Case Update
    Filibusters, and appellate cases on all the ways lawyers can screw up.
  • April 7, 2017
    Change of course
    A new approach in my client-attorney relationships
  • April 4, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A true rocket docket, and Anthony Sowell pops up again
  • April 3, 2017
    Case Update
    Free merchant speech, an argument on Brady, another look at Creech