Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

No decisions of note out of the Ohio Supreme Court, not even a nice disciplinary case or two to munch on, so let's get straight to the courts of appeals decisions:

On the civil side, The 6th District reverses the grant of a motion in limine and summary judgment in a malpractice case, holding that simply because the plaintiff's doctor was in a different specialty from the defendant did not allow exclusion of his expert testimony.  The 1st District holds that the Juvenile Court could assess GAL fees against the parents in a custody fight, but couldn't hold them in criminal contempt for not paying them.  The 8th District reverses a summary judgment and holds that a non-compete covenant for a physician is not automatically invalid as against public policy. 

In criminal cases, the 9th District affirms a conviction for tampering with evidence where the defendant threw drug evidence away as he fled from the police.  The 3rd District upholds a community control sentence in a conviction for gross sexual imposition against an appeal from the state that the presumption for imprisonment should have been invoked.  The 9th District also holds that a court need not determine that the child is competent before admitting his statements made for purposes of medical treatment under 803(4); this issue is currently pending before the Ohio Supreme Court.  The 4th District upholds the trial court's decision to shackle the defendant during trial; the decision's a little questionable (one judge dissented), but it has a decent review of the law on the subject.

I Think They Covered This in Criminal Procedure:  One of the assignments of error in State v. Hall was that the defendant's conviction of attempted rape was against the manifest weight of the evidence. 

The defendant had pled guilty.

This week, I'll take another look at what remains of judicial review of sentencing post-Foster, and do a quick-and-dirty review of the new forfeiture law.  Catch you then.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States