Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

We're getting into the home stretch of the US Supreme Court's October 2006 term, and we can expect to see several important decisions handed down over the next few weeks:  one on the effect of the Federal sentencing guidelines, another on taxpayer standing to challenge faith-based programs on First Amendment grounds, and one on using race as a method of assigning students to public schools.  And let's not forget the "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" case, which is sure to take its rightful place in the pantheon of landmark Supreme Court decisions. 

The Ohio Supreme Court churned out six decisions last week.  The most prominent was Welling v. Weinfeld, in which the Court adopted the "false light" theory of invasion of privacy.  It's probably not going to come up that often; there is a difference between false light and defamation, but it's a narrow one. 

In the 1st District this past week, Judge Mark Painter was busy, first reluctantly affirming summary judgment in a case where the plaintiff had stumbled over a bunched-up carpet; Judge Painter expressed his opinion that the "open and obvious" doctrine should be subsumed into comparative negligence, as he has done in other opinions, to the annoyance of at least one other judge, as indicated in this dissent.  He also authored the opinion affirming a $1.5 million judgment in a medical malpractice case, and held that the doctor's "ostrich-like defense" in the face of "overwhelming evidence that he had botched the operation" warranted award of prejudgment interest as well. 

The 10th District has a good case on what's a "reasonable time" in contract cases, holding that a builder a took a year to complete something that should have taken three months didn't make the cut.  The 9th District holds that a domestic violence victim's statements to her mother an hour after the incident could still constitute an "excited utterance."  The 3rd District holds that where the parties in a divorce case stipulate to the date of termination of the marriage, the court errs in picking a different one.

Closer to home, the 8th District reversed a search of a vehicle after a misdemeanor arrest; for whatever reason, the trial court had held that the right to search the passenger compartment applied only where the arrest was a felony.  In a DWI case, the court upheld the overruling of a motion to suppress where the police found the defendant passed out in his car, with the car keys clutched in his hand.  And in a civil case of first impression, the court reverses the granting of a motion to dismiss where the plaintiff failed to attach an affidavit of merit to a medical claim, holding that the appropriate motion for a defendant to file was a motion for more definite statement.

And here's the kind of tip that makes reading this blog worthwhile:  as noted by the 5th District, the procedure for evicting someone from a trailer park is governed by RC Chapter 3733, not Chapter 5321.

Trust me, there'll come a time when you'll thank me.

Search

Recent Entries

  • January 19, 2018
    The search for data
    I know more about how Aaron Judge does than what sentences are being handed down in criminal cases, and why that's a problem.
  • January 17, 2018
    What's Up in the 8th
    When not to decide cases on allied offenses and pre-indictment delay
  • January 11, 2018
    Case Update
    Three new decisions from the Ohio Supreme Court
  • January 10, 2018
    To the barricades!
    Why I'm a threat to the Ohio state government
  • January 5, 2018
    Search and seizure in the digital age
    Do the cops need a warrant to get cell phone data?
  • January 3, 2018
    What's Up in the 8th
    We talk about me a lot, but there's some other stuff, too
  • January 2, 2018
    He's baaaack
    So I thought I'd start my first post in six weeks by explaining why it's my first post in six weeks. Ever run into somebody and ask the obligatory question, "How are you doing?" And they proceed to tell you...
  • November 15, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Plea withdrawals (again), sexual predator hearings, and an appellate law question
  • November 7, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Don't listen to prosecutors about the law, good new/bad news jokes on appeal, and the Byzantine course of a death penalty case
  • October 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Trying to change the past