Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

Two of the most anticipated Supeme Court cases in recent years are Rita v. US and Claiborne v. US.  As I mentioned a couple weeks back, they're the first post-Booker decisions to come down, and it's expected that they will clarify the exact status of the sentencing guidelines, something that the appellate courts have been wrestling with since Booker was handed down in January of 2005.  The Court had argument on the two cases in February, and a decision is expected any day now.

Except that last week, Claiborne went and got himself killed in an attempted robbery, thereby mooting his case.  There are other cases in the pipeline which raise the same issue, and the court could even decide one of those cases without oral argument and announce it at the same time as they would have announced Claiborne, simply substituting one set of facts for the other.  But I'm pretty sure this is a Supreme Court first.

Closer to home, the Ohio Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the law requiring a change of circumstances for custody modification.  As between parents, the law raises no problems.  In Re Braden James, custody had been awarded to the maternal grandparents, and the biological parents sought custody, claiming that the requirement of proving a change of circumstances interfered with their constitutional right to raise their children.  The appellate court bought that contention, but the Supremes rejected it by a 4-3 vote.  There's some interesting issues floating around there, and I'll do a post on it in the next week or so.  On to the appellate courts:

1st District holds that proof of firearm specification can be proved without "overt act" (such as reaching into pocket) by defendant... 10th District upholds admissibility of defendant's calling co-defendant a "snitch" as showing consciousness of guilt... 8th District affirms summary judgment dismissing case brought by gas dealers complaining that Shell Oil charged them higher wholesale prices because they were minorities... 12th District holds that temporary employment agency had no duty to run criminal check on employees, affirms summary judgment for agency on claim of assault by employee... 9th District upholds child pornography statutes against attack that difficulty distinguishing between virtual and actual child pornography makes them void for vagueness... 5th District holds that employee's driving drunk seventy miles from her route was criminal act not within the scope of her employment, affirms summary judgement in personal injury case against her employee...

Talk about client control.  From the 6th District's decision last week in State v. Phillips:

After being sworn, appellant testified that the appointed attorney, Scott Hicks, who represented appellant at the time that he entered his guilty plea, threatened to throw appellant out the window if he did not listen to the attorney.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States