Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Crime in the City

From the category of Things I Didn't Need the Newspaper to Tell Me:

Do judges in Ohio's rural counties send certain offenders to prison at a higher rate than judges in larger counties?

The answer -- according to three area common pleas court judges -- is yes.

Actually, I didn't find myself disagreeing with the sentiments expressed in the article as much I thought I would; it's hard to argue with the basic notion that a judge's sentencing should reflect the values of the community.  To be sure, the small-county judges who were interviewed admitted they could do this because they weren't swamped with cases like the big counties, and that if the larger counties started meting out similarly stiff sentences, the Ohio prisons would be swamped.  (It's sort of a "we can do this because you can't" argument.)

It reminded me of the time I went out to Ashtabula County for an arraignment a long time ago.  It was my first time there, and while waiting for the arraignments to start, I sat through a plea hearing.  I've never seen a plea hearing like that, before or since:  the whole thing took over a half hour, with the colloquy on the defendant's rights taking up a good twenty minutes.  As I sat there listening to the judge explain the right against self-incrimination in such detail that the defendant could have passed the criminal law question on the bar exam, I thought, "Geez, this must be a really big case." 

Turns out it was a theft prosecution.  The defendant was a truck driver, carrying a load of goods from Cleveland to Boston.  The truck had broken down right outside Ashtabula, he'd called his boss, and the boss told him to fix it and he'd reimburse him later.  Just like he'd told him the last three times the truck had broken down, but he'd never gotten around to reimbursing the guy.  So the driver simply sold enough of the goods to pay for the repairs, then continued on to Boston.  He spent two months in jail before he worked out a plea deal.

To the indictment.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States
  • June 27, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A worrisome decision on expert funding, and, mirabile dictu, a court's dismissal of a case for a discovery violation is upheld