Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Court Update

There were three cases from the Ohio Supreme Court this past week:  one held that the Patients Bill of Rights overcome a county nursing home's claim to sovereign immunity in a lawsuit brought on behalf of a patient; another held that an arbitrator could use case law in defining what constituted "good cause" if the contract he was interpreting didn't define it; and the third held that "attempted" drug crimes were governed by the individual drug statutes, rather than the general attempt statute. 

In the court of appeals, not too much went on, for whatever reason.  Maybe the mail didn't get to Lexis-Nexis; at any rate, there were only about 50 decisions last week.  The highlights: 

1st District affirms conviction of tampering with evidence where defendant threw down bag of cocaine in an attempt to avoid being caught with it... 8th District reverses conviction of receiving stolen property, finds evidence insufficient to show defendant knew car was stolen... 12th District holds that trial court's colloquy regarding defendant's right of self-representation was insufficient... 12th District holds that email messages don't amount to lease contract, also holds that effect of eviction on credit rating prevents tenant's claim from being moot... 11th District holds that magistrate not required to evaluate tax consequences of marital distribution where parties don't present expert testimony on that issue...

Yesterday was exactly one year since I made my first post on this blog.  In May of last year, I had exactly 17 hits; last month, it numbered in the thousands.  True, a number of those were Google or Yahoo searches from wherever, like the guy from the Isle of Anglesey who, for reasons known only to him and his god, decided to search the Florida law on obstructions in the aisle.  But I've got a number of regular readers, too.  More importantly, I enjoy doing this.  It keeps me abreast of what's going on in the law, and it satisfies my writing jones.

I'm going to make some changes, though.  First, once I figure out how, I'm going to turn off the comment feature.  I've had about 12 comments in the past year that are actually valid.  Unfortunately, the way the Internet works, I get about that many spam comments every ten minutes.  Rather than scanning several hundred messages telling me the great variety of drugs I can purchase online, to say nothing of helpful hints on how to increase my penis and/or breast size (I've decided to hedge my bets and do both), just to find the occasional comment from a real person, I'm going to drop that feature.  If there's something you think is worth mentioning, send me an email, and I may even use it as a jump-off point for a post.

That's another thing:  feel free to drop me an email, telling me what you think of the site, or making suggestions.  Shorter posts?  More on civil cases/criminal cases?  Less commentary?  More commentary?  I'm always open to ideas.

Last, I've put links to some other sites here, and will be featuring them a little more.  One of the new ones I put up is CrimeLaw, because I ran across this comment.  What it says is obviously true, and something I've certainly noticed, but he puts a slightly different, and more interesting, slant on it.

Do this: Go into any criminal court in the country during a person's first appearance.  Count the number of people wearing a suit or even business-casual clothing.  When I first saw a full courtroom, I almost wept.  "No one," I thought to myself, "was ever told that you should wear a suit to court."  Think that through.  Many people go through their entire lives without anyone guiding them, telling them basic things like, "Appearances matter."  Imagine what other lessons they must have missed out on?

See you tomorrow.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States