Comments on: Case Update http://briefcase8.com/2007/05/07/case-update-9/ Case analysis with an attitude Mon, 21 May 2012 14:51:19 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: state laws http://briefcase8.com/2007/05/07/case-update-9/comment-page-1/#comment-71052 state laws Sat, 06 Mar 2010 21:24:56 +0000 http://briefcase8.com/2007/05/07/case-update-9/#comment-71052 "The only case of note out of the Ohio Supreme Court this week was State v. Sterling, which struck down a provision of the DNA testing law which allowed the prosecutor to refuse DNA testing to an inmate, and then made his decision unreviewable by the courts. The Court unanimously held this was an unconstitutional violation of the doctrine of separation of powers. Ya think?" Perhaps. It probably is in the interest to review. Although proper research would be advisable. “The only case of note out of the Ohio Supreme Court this week was State v. Sterling, which struck down a provision of the DNA testing law which allowed the prosecutor to refuse DNA testing to an inmate, and then made his decision unreviewable by the courts. The Court unanimously held this was an unconstitutional violation of the doctrine of separation of powers. Ya think?”

Perhaps. It probably is in the interest to review. Although proper research would be advisable.

]]>