Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Fender-benders and Memory Lane

Remember the Golden Era of personal injury law, when the whiskey was strong, the women were wild, and anybody who didn't get at least five times specials in a rear-ender with no property damage risked investigation by Disciplinary Counsel?  And then we got a little too greedy until the public said enough, and now you're happy if the insurance company offers you more than $2,300 when your client's got $1,700 in meds.

Of if they offer you anything at all.  The other day, I realized that I hadn't run into a "zero damage" case in a while.  You know, the ones where the defendant admits liability, and the jury comes back with a plaintiff's verdict but awards no damages.  I wrote a post a short while back about three of them that were handed down in just one week in December, and another one earlier last year taking stock of the case law on that issue.  But, as I said, I haven't seen any in about three months now.  It could be that juries are becoming more magnanimous, or it could be that plaintiffs' counsel just doesn't bother appealing anymore when that happens.  Gee, I wonder which one it is.

The one bright spot is provided by the 8th District's decisions in prejudgment interest cases; most of them have gone in favor of plaintiffs, as I detailed here, and in one mentioned in the post I cited above, in which the court affirmed $32,000 in prejudgment interest where the insurance company had offered $6,300 (in response to meds of $8,100, and a demand of $20,000), only to see the jury trudge back into the courtroom and award the plaintiff $115,000.  I went back and checked to see which insurance company had been involved in those cases, and while I won't mention any names, it seems likely that very few members of the 8th District bench are in good hands.

Search

Recent Entries

  • May 22, 2017
    Case Update
    Is SCOTUS looking for a forfeiture case? Plus, appellate decisions on expungement and restitution, plain error, and what a judge has to tell a defendant about sex registration
  • May 19, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part II
    Decisions on lineups and prior calculation and design, and two out of eight (eight!) pro se defendants come up winners,
  • May 17, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part I
    Taking a first look at some of the 8th District's decisions over the past two weeks
  • May 16, 2017
    Case Update
    Stock tips, Federal sentencing reform goes dormant, schoolbag searches, and the retroactivity of State v. Hand
  • May 8, 2017
    Case Update
    Death in Arkansas, a worrisome disciplinary decision, and appellate cases on speedy trial, arson registration, use of prior testimony, and the futility of post-conviction relief
  • May 2, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Nothing but sex
  • May 1, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS closes out oral argument for the Term, the Ohio Supreme Court has seven of them this week, and we report on a decision where you'll probably want to play Paul Simon's "Still Crazy After All These Years" in the background while you read about it
  • April 26, 2017
    MIA
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives