Recent Posts

  • Friday Roundup
  • Penal Dysfunction?
  • Guns in the city
  • Punting on punitive damages
  • Case Update
  • Friday Roundup
  • One more on Boston
  • Fighting the good fight
  • Punitive damages
  • Case Update


  • Categories

  • Civil
  • Criminal
  • Constitutional
  • Potpourri
  • Rants


  • Archives

  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • Case Update

    February 26th, 2007

    No news out of the Ohio Supreme Court last week, and we already discussed the biggie from the US Supreme Court on punitive damage awards.  On to the courts of appeals:

    Criminal.  1st District reverses denial of motion to suppress, finds that slow speed — 43 in 65 zone — not indicative of criminal activity warranting stop… 8th District affirms dismissal of case because prosecution failed to produce discovery… 9th District says that two lawyers from same office representing co-defendants not a conflict of interest… 5th District vacates mandatory fine for drug trafficking where court failed to conduct hearing on defendant’s ability to pay…

    Civil.  8th District holds that after law-firm breakup, partners not required to share contingent fees from cases they divvied up… Defendant not entitled to setoff from plaintiff’s settlement with third party where settlement agreement specified third party denied liability, 9th District holds… 10th District says refusal of trial court to permit late answer to requests for admissions reviewable only for abuse of discretion, upholds summary judgment; but see this post and this case from 8th District for contra… Fact that husband’s attorney prepared child support worksheet not “invited error,” holds 5th District, doesn’t preclude husband’s appeal that worksheet was wrong…

    The decision in State v. Bacher starts out, “the following facts are provided both to inform the reader and to refresh defendant-appellant Brandon Bacher’s recollection of his arrest,” and gets better.  Bacher was stopped for driving 43 mph on I-71, and the court proceeded to detail his “apparent delusions, misconceptions, and concerns,” which included his belief that the Ohio Revised Code required that vehicles be impounded by the American Automobile Association instead of the Bureau of Motor Vehicles.  The court quoted Ron White’s comedy album Tater Salad for its conclusion that Bacher “had the right to remain silent, but not the ability.”

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    Common Pleas-General
    Common Pleas-Domestic
    Common Pleas-Juvenile
    Common Pleas-Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Ohio Supreme Court
    Geauga County Common Pleas
    Lake County Common Pleas
    Lorain County Common Pleas
    Summit County Common Pleas
    Links to all Ohio Courts
    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    US Supreme Court
    6th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    Appellate Law & Practice
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Confrontation Blog
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    A Stitch in Haste
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Ohio Personal Injury Lawyer
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    OACDL
    CCDLA

    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs