Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Case Update

The only decision from the Ohio Supreme Court this week was one involving the regulation of cellular phone service, and the day I start reading PUCO decisions is the day I stick a fork into a toaster.  One note about the Supreme Court, though; a few weeks back, I'd mentioned that the Court was scanning all documents, so that you had on-line access to them.  Turns out that they're being scanned in image format, which means that you can download and read them, but you can't edit them as you would a normal word-processing document.  Now, on to the cases:

Civil.  1st District reverses trial court for failure to grant protective order for trade secrets, holding that trial court's statement "with discovery issues, I let people get what they want" wasn't quite the detailed analysis required under Rule 26(C)... Husband who learned child he'd supported to majority wasn't his didn't have claim against biological father for unjust enrichment, 9th District rules... 10th District reverses award of $6000 in attorney fees for tenant who recovered $700 for security deposit wrongfully withheld, says that fees must bear a relationship to damages recovered... 12 District holds trial court abused discretion by refusing to consider social security benefits in determining spousal support when benefits were sole source of husband's income...

Criminal.  Several cases on guilty pleas:  1st District holds that Foster has no effect on determining whether plea was voluntarily made, where plea was made before Foster; 8th District upholds guilty plea, says court not required to advise defendant of right to testify or availability of self-defense; and where case remanded for resentencing, trial court had no jurisdiction to entertain motion to vacate plea where that issue not raised on appeal, 3rd District holds...10th District rules that defendant opened door to testimony by detective that he was "sure" defendant was the shooter, by calling detective as witness and asking him if he'd taken gunshot residue tests from other people at scene...

And the Kenny Rogers award for You Gotta Know When to Hold 'Em, You Gotta Know When to Fold 'Em for this week goes to the defendant in State v. Brooks:

After imposing the one year sentence, appellant requested three days to get his affairs in order.  The trial court refused, stating, "Not after what you did when you were out, you think I'm going to trust you again?"  Appellant then asked, "So I have to go to prison with nothing?"  The trial court responded, "You go sit down, we will make sure you've got something when you go to prison. You will have your orange jumpsuit, go sit down. You don't show me nothing, man."  Thereafter, the following occurred:

"THE DEFENDANT: (Unintelligible mumbling).

"THE COURT: It's about time for resentencing in this case. I misjudged this man. I thought he was worthy of a minimum sentence.

"THE DEFENDANT: I am.

"THE COURT: No. The sentence is two years in this case. He is unrepentant. He is a jerk. He thinks the world owes him a living. It doesn't. The sentence is two years, Mr. Brooks."

The appellate court upheld the sentence.  Guess that taught the guy to unintelligibly mumble.

Meanwhile, "you don't show me nothing, man"?  Whatever happened to judicial decorum?  I guess it's fortunate that the judge didn't have to delve into his repertoire of "yo mama" jokes.

Search

Recent Entries

  • September 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Prior consistent statements, whether State v. Hand is applied retroactively, and a big Coming Attraction
  • September 11, 2017
    Case Update
    Looking back at Melendez-Diaz, and the 8th goes 0 for 2 in the Supreme Court
  • September 8, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Pro bono work, screwed-up appeals, and is Subway shorting their customers?
  • September 5, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The barriers to expungement, jury verdict forms, and hybrid representation
  • August 31, 2017
    Constructive possession
    Constructive possession is 9/10ths of the law
  • August 29, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A traffic stop found Samson Primm in possession of a few grams of marijuana, but he hires a lawyer and files a motion to suppress the stop. On the day of trial, the City asks to dismiss the case. Primm...
  • August 28, 2017
    Truth in plea bargaining
    So I got a brochure last week from Judge Donnelly over at the Common Pleas court. As you can see, it's a panel discussion on plea bargaining. The judge asked me to get out the word, so I just sort...
  • August 15, 2017
    Summer Break
    Got a bunch of stuff to do over the next couple weeks, and with the slowdown in the courts, it's a good time to take a break. I'll be back here on August 28. See you then....
  • August 11, 2017
    Friday Musings
    Drug trafficking, ADA lawsuit abuse, and e-filing
  • August 10, 2017
    Case Update
    Waiting on SCOTUS; two Ohio Supreme Court decisions