Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

For real?

The defendant in State v. Marcus recently got a rude introduction to some of the intricacies of Ohio's drug laws.  The police had set him up for a controlled buy of cocaine, but when the deal went down, it turned out that what he had tested negative for drugs.  He was convicted of both drug trafficking under RC 2925.03 (offering to sell), and offering to sell a counterfeit controlled substance under RC 2925.37(B).

On appeal, he argued that the Supreme Court's decision last May in State v. Chandler meant that one had to have a measurable quantity of actual drugs in order to be convicted of sale.  Chandler simply holds that the drugs have to be real in order to convict the defendant of the major drug offender specification, as I explained in my post about the case at the time; the 8th District rightly noted that there any number of cases out there holding that somebody can be convicted of trafficking for only offering fake drugs for sale.

In fact, there are plenty of cases holding that you can be convicted of both trafficking and counterfeit substances; they're not allied offenses.  While this is technically correct under standard allied-offenses analysis, it's one of those cases where the technical basis of the law doesn't rest on a logical basis:  if you're going to penalize people for drug trafficking regardless of whether the drugs they're dealing are real or not, it doesn't make much sense to have a separate statute on dealing fake drugs.

I did run across one interesting case, though.  In State v. Garrett, the 11th District held that in order to convict someone of counterfeit drugs, you have to prove that they were counterfeit drugs.  The state hadn't introduced the substance, nor did they offer any testimony about tests done on it; they simply had lay witnesses say that it didn't look like LSD.  According to the court, that wasn't enough.  If you've got a case on counterfeit drugs, that's definitely worth a look.

Another thing worth a look is Ohio Prof. Doug Berman's blog, Sentencing Law and Policy, a recent addition to the Blogroll on the right sidebar.  It'll give you information on virtually every aspect of state and Federal sentencing law, and some good insights as well; Berman correctly predicted the difficulties Ohio's sentencing scheme faced after the US Supreme Court's Blakely decision, difficulties that culminated in the Ohio statutes being thrown out in large measure earlier this year. 

By the way, on this date in 1975, President Gerald Ford nominated John Paul Stephens to the Supreme Court seat vacated by William O. Douglas.

Search

Recent Entries

  • May 22, 2017
    Case Update
    Is SCOTUS looking for a forfeiture case? Plus, appellate decisions on expungement and restitution, plain error, and what a judge has to tell a defendant about sex registration
  • May 19, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part II
    Decisions on lineups and prior calculation and design, and two out of eight (eight!) pro se defendants come up winners,
  • May 17, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part I
    Taking a first look at some of the 8th District's decisions over the past two weeks
  • May 16, 2017
    Case Update
    Stock tips, Federal sentencing reform goes dormant, schoolbag searches, and the retroactivity of State v. Hand
  • May 8, 2017
    Case Update
    Death in Arkansas, a worrisome disciplinary decision, and appellate cases on speedy trial, arson registration, use of prior testimony, and the futility of post-conviction relief
  • May 2, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Nothing but sex
  • May 1, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS closes out oral argument for the Term, the Ohio Supreme Court has seven of them this week, and we report on a decision where you'll probably want to play Paul Simon's "Still Crazy After All These Years" in the background while you read about it
  • April 26, 2017
    MIA
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives