Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

Weekly roundup

Quick trip around the courts the past week or so... 

8th District finds sufficient corroborating evidence for conviction of sexual imposition; opinion shows how little evidence is required... Proving that premises are a residence isn't sufficient to prove "likely to be present" element in burglary, as mentioned here earlier this week, but it it is to prove element that premises are "occupied," as this decision from the 9th District shows... 1st District says that failure to advise defendant that he couldn't appeal denial of his suppression motion after guilty plea did not render plea involuntary... Trial judge can terminate post-release controls under RC 2929.141, but not parole, so 8th District vacates plea where judge told defendant she would "take care of" his parole violation...

1st District applies "attendant circumstances" rule to question of whether less than 2" deviation in sidewalk was substantial... Good case from the 2nd District on considerations to be used by courts in determining whether child support obligor is voluntarily underemployed... 2nd District holds that former auto salesman could testify as expert, under Rule 701, that dealership was doing shady stuff, but rejects argument that court could take judicial notice of same under Rule 201 (okay, I made that last part up)...

And the captain of the Dummy Team this week is the defendant in this case, who argued that the judge unfairly terminated his community control sanctions.  Part of the sanctions, imposed for a weapons disability conviction, was the requirement that the defendant attend the Victims of Violent Crime Impact Panel.  The defendant did indeed report to the probation department when the program was scheduled.  Unfortunately, he was intoxicated at the time. 

Probably one of those guys who, when told that they've blown a .25 on the breathalyzer, respond with, "Wow, I'm only 25% drunk!"
Have a good weekend.

Search

Recent Entries

  • July 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Some things we knew, some things we didn't
  • July 21, 2017
    Friday Roundup
    Computers and sex offenders, civil forfeiture, and phrases that should be put out to pasture
  • July 20, 2017
    Case Update
    A look at the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Oles, and did you know that Justice Ginsburg has a .311 batting average with runners in scoring position? Oh, wait...
  • July 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Judicial bias, RVO specs, 26(B) stuff, waivers of counsel... And more!
  • July 17, 2017
    No more Anders Briefs?
    I have a case now in the 8th District where I came close to filing an Anders brief the other week. It's an appeal from a plea and sentence. The plea hearing was flawless. The judge imposed consecutive sentences, and...
  • July 13, 2017
    Sex offenders and the First Amendment
    Analysis of the Supreme Court's decision in Packingham v. North Carolina
  • July 12, 2017
    Removing a retained attorney
    What does a judge do if he thinks a retained attorney in a criminal case isn't competent?
  • July 11, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    The court does good work on a juvenile bindover case, and the State finally figures out that it should have indicted someone in the first place
  • July 10, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS ends its term; the Ohio Supreme Court issues another opinion, and likely the last one, on the trial tax
  • June 28, 2017
    Plea Bargaining -- The defendant's view
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision last week in Lee v. United States