Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

July 22, 2006

Quick wrapup of some of the week's highlights:

Supreme Court reverses 8th District, holds that conviction as aider and abettor proper even where principal offender not identified... 3rd District holds that even though identification procedure unduly suggestive, witness could still make in-court ID... 12th District rules guilty plea in rape case waives claims that witnesses were incompetent, also waives claim of counsel's ineffectiveness unless defendant can show she would not have entered guilty plea but for counsel's errors... 8th District holds that passing bad checks and theft aren't allied offenses...

1st District reverses jury verdict awarding no damages for future pain and suffering where uncontested that plaintiff would have pain in future... 6th District affirms summary judgment in slip and fall on ice by postman delivering mail to defendant's home; plaintiff claimed that defendant had slipped on same spot two hours earlier, so had "superior knowledge" of danger and thus a duty to warn, court wasn't buying... 9th District says trial court can conduct de novo review of magistrate's decision, overrule decision on an issue even if not requested by objecting party... 5th District rejects lawyer's appeal from judgment of $6040 for DWI, lawyer had already been paid $6800, sought additional $14,000 (where do I get clients like that?)...

And if you've got time on your hands and want to sue a telemarketer, this case will tell you all you need to know about the Federal and state law on it.  On the other hand, if you get an unsolicited fax and are just itching to get even with the sender, this is where you want to look.

Search

Recent Entries

  • January 17, 2018
    What's Up in the 8th
    When not to decide cases on allied offenses and pre-indictment delay
  • January 11, 2018
    Case Update
    Three new decisions from the Ohio Supreme Court
  • January 10, 2018
    To the barricades!
    Why I'm a threat to the Ohio state government
  • January 5, 2018
    Search and seizure in the digital age
    Do the cops need a warrant to get cell phone data?
  • January 3, 2018
    What's Up in the 8th
    We talk about me a lot, but there's some other stuff, too
  • January 2, 2018
    He's baaaack
    So I thought I'd start my first post in six weeks by explaining why it's my first post in six weeks. Ever run into somebody and ask the obligatory question, "How are you doing?" And they proceed to tell you...
  • November 15, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Plea withdrawals (again), sexual predator hearings, and an appellate law question
  • November 7, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Don't listen to prosecutors about the law, good new/bad news jokes on appeal, and the Byzantine course of a death penalty case
  • October 24, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Trying to change the past
  • October 16, 2017
    En banc on sentencing
    The 8th District takes a look at what State v. Marcum means