Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

July 8, 2006

Let's see what happened during the week...

5th District affirms grant of grandparent visitation over objection of mother, good discussion of criteria court should use...  8th district holds GAL fees ordered as child support not dischargeable in bankruptcy... 10th district affirms grant of summary judgment, holding that absence of handrail on one side of steps in bar was "open and obvious," despite dim lighting... 1st District reverses defense verdict in medical malpractice case for improper conduct of defense counsel, marking fourth time that this court has reversed this lawyer on this basis... 2nd District reverses summary judgment in workers comp case where plaintiff injured crossing street to employee parking lot; extended discussion of "coming and going" rule...

12th District holds that defendant's speedy trial rights violated by, among other things, court taking 252 days to rule on motion to reconsider its ruling on motion to suppress; case discusses just about every possible aspect of speedy trial... Good discussion by 11th District of when court should sua sponte consider incompetency of defendant... 2nd District reverses court's refusal to permit defendant to withdraw plea to non-support, holding that court should have considered defendant's argument that he lacked ability to pay, since that was a defense to charge... 6th District joins six other districts in holding that Gay Marriage Amendment doesn't bar prosecution of cohabitants for domestic violence, something I discussed a while back...

And, if you've thought it might be fun to be an appellate court judge, take a look at the assignment of error by the pro se defendant in this case:

The Trial Court Erred in Granting Summary Judgement ; the State Has Pleaded Gulity at the Appellate Court Level, Reversed and Remanded Case No. 83572, 2004 Ohio 2696. In the Court of Claims the State Denies All Issues Catagorically , on October 19, 2005 Pre-screening Entry the Court Sua Sponte Amends the Caption Joseph Hardy Vs. Belmont Correctional Institution, Et. Al., under 2743.02 of the Revised Code Section 2743, Where the State Has Pleaded Guilty to Double-jeopardy Reversed by the Appellate Court the Plaintiff Has Met the Burden of Proof, the Court Errs after These Matters Had Been Set for Trial to Entertain Summary Judgement Without Journal Entry Without Leave Civ. Rule .5704 Set Forth in Loc. Rule .2101. Counsel of Record Was Not Jana M. Brown Rule .1802, the Court Failed to Qualify the Expert Witness after the Expiration Date October 24, 2005 Civ. Rule .56(e) Summary Judgment Would Be a Direct Conflict There must Be a Settlement Minimum a Fair Trial. Thereby Violating the Plaintiff Rights of Equal Protection and Due Process as Guaranteed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, Section 1 § 2 and § 10 of the Ohio Constitution Where the State Had Plead Gulity to Double Jeopardy Codicil (In Pari Delicto) a Judgement Which Includes Usurious Interest Is Erroneous § 1343.04.

The court observed that "appellant's brief is basically unintelligible."

By the way, that wasn't the only assignment of error.

Search

Recent Entries

  • April 26, 2017
    MIA
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives
  • April 17, 2017
    Case Update
    Structural error, prejudice, and police run amok.
  • April 13, 2017
    Some arguments on sentencing
    Why oral arguments can be fun, even when they're not yours
  • April 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Oh fun: declarations against interest v. non-hearsay. Also, the difference between not guilty and innocent, and Ohio's statute penalizing the refusal to take chemical test in a DUI case goes bye-bye
  • April 11, 2017
    Case Update
    Filibusters, and appellate cases on all the ways lawyers can screw up.
  • April 7, 2017
    Change of course
    A new approach in my client-attorney relationships
  • April 4, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A true rocket docket, and Anthony Sowell pops up again
  • April 3, 2017
    Case Update
    Free merchant speech, an argument on Brady, another look at Creech