Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

July 25, 2006

I put off writing anything about Crawford v. Washington for over a month, and now I can't shut up about it...

We discussed the decision last week, here and here, and I came across some additional stuff.  I mentioned a couple of months ago the statute which permits the state to introduce drug tests without the testimony of the chemist who performed them.  Even when "live" testimony for a test is given, it often happens that someone other than the person who actually performed the tests will testify, based upon the latter's notes.  And it's not uncommon for records of the calibration or other information concerning breathalyzers to come in under the business records exception to the hearsay rule.

Does any of this violate Crawford?  The 3rd District thought so last year, throwing out a conviction where the state sought to introduce DNA tests through someone other than the person who'd actually performed them.  The 6th District, though, came to a contrary conclusion, holding in a DWI case that documents establishing that the breathalyzer was properly calculated and that the officer performing the test was qualified to do so were properly admitted as business records.

The Ohio Supreme Court certified the conflict between the two cases, and will probably rule on it early next year.  Stay tuned.

Search

Recent Entries

  • April 26, 2017
    MIA
    Like Mark Twain, rumors of my demise have been greatly exaggerated. Except I am pretty sure he's actually dead, while I am not, and for that matter, nobody's spreading rumors that I am. Great lead, huh? The nice thing about...
  • April 20, 2017
    The Supreme Court takes a look at the trial tax
    And you thought this was the week you only had to worry about income taxes
  • April 18, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Remembering Warren Zevon, and the Fourth Amendment lives
  • April 17, 2017
    Case Update
    Structural error, prejudice, and police run amok.
  • April 13, 2017
    Some arguments on sentencing
    Why oral arguments can be fun, even when they're not yours
  • April 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Oh fun: declarations against interest v. non-hearsay. Also, the difference between not guilty and innocent, and Ohio's statute penalizing the refusal to take chemical test in a DUI case goes bye-bye
  • April 11, 2017
    Case Update
    Filibusters, and appellate cases on all the ways lawyers can screw up.
  • April 7, 2017
    Change of course
    A new approach in my client-attorney relationships
  • April 4, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A true rocket docket, and Anthony Sowell pops up again
  • April 3, 2017
    Case Update
    Free merchant speech, an argument on Brady, another look at Creech