Recent Posts

  • Sentencing: Clarifying the standard of review
  • Another go-around on Rance
  • Open discovery update
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update
  • Good people
  • Open discovery is coming… maybe
  • The pitfall with Crawford
  • What’s Up in the 8th
  • Case Update


  • Categories

  • Civil
  • Criminal
  • Constitutional
  • Potpourri
  • Rants


  • Archives

  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006


  • June 24, 2006

    June 24th, 2006

    Not a whole lot for this week’s roundup; hopefully, the golf handicaps of our appellate judges are declining in pace with those of the bar in general.

    9th District holds that landlord shopping center’s duty to tenant’s employee is duty owed to a licensee, not an invitee; as concurring opinion points out, this isn’t so… If you’re defending a motion to vacate a default judgment, the 10th District’s decision in Nat’l City Bank v. Calvey is the one to have:  although motion filed only a month after default judgment for $125,000, court stringently applies “reasonable neglect” standard against defendant, says her claim that she was traveling to take care of her sick mother not sufficient excuse for failure to respond to complaint… Another round of plaintiff smackdown, this time from the 12th District:  Plaintiffs asked jury for $542,000, got $9,000, court upholds it…  2nd District says trial court erred in not taking into consideration ex-husband’s inheritance of $1,000,000 in determining modification of spousal support… 

    10th District follows its rule that, in any post-Blakely sentencing, failure of defendant to object to sentence at hearing waives all but plain error…  Jury announces it’s deadlocked after three hours of deliberation, judge gives dynamite charge, jury deliberates another 30 minutes, still says it’s deadlocked, judge declares mistrial; 2nd District says that “manifest necessity” of declaring mistrial did not preclude retrial on double jeopardy grounds.  Review was on plain error basis, though; defendant did not object to declaration of mistrial, or file motion for jeopardy prior to second trial… As noted last week, prosecutor’s mentioning of defendant’s invocation of Miranda rights is barred; 8th District holds that prosecution can bring out fact that defendant refused to make written statement where he first made oral statement…

    Enjoy your weekend.

    Leave a Reply


    Search Posts




    Court Links

    Cuyahoga County
    Court of Appeals
    Common Pleas-General
    Common Pleas-Domestic
    Common Pleas-Juvenile
    Common Pleas-Probate

    Ohio Courts
    Ohio Supreme Court
    Geauga County Common Pleas
    Lake County Common Pleas
    Lorain County Common Pleas
    Summit County Common Pleas
    Links to all Ohio Courts
    Ohio Revised Code

    Federal Courts
    US Supreme Court
    6th Circuit Court of Appeals
    Ohio Northern District
    Ohio Southern District



    Law Blogs

    Sentencing Law & Policy
    Volokh Conspiracy
    Appellate Law & Practice
    CrimLaw
    Grits for Breakfast
    Confrontation Blog
    CrimProf Blog
    How Appealing
    Crime and Consequences
    Drug War Rant
    A Stitch in Haste
    Overlawyered
    Balkinization
    Inside Opinions: Legal Blogs
    ScotusBlog

    Ohio Law blogs

    Cleveland Law Library
    6th Circuit - Criminal
    6th Circuit - General
    Ohio Personal Injury Lawyer
    Ohio Family Law Blog
    OACDL
    CCDLA

    Blogfinder

    Law Blog Metrics



    lawyer blogs