Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

May 15, 2006

The court holds that the trial judge went too far in dismissing the indictment for failure to provide discovery in State v. Warfield, holding that the lower court should have imposed a less Draconian sanction, such as exclusion of the evidence at trial.

Maybe, but then again. . . . The trial court had ordered the prosecution to produce a rental receipt, which was the key evidence, by the pretrial date of February 17, 2005. This is the colloquy between the judge and the prosecutor on that date: 

The Court: You talked to Detective Pirinelli and he said he was not bringing it?

Ms. Cameron: That’s correct, but I talked with him last week.

The Court: Oh, okay was there a reason why he was refusing to bring it?

Ms. Cameron: He’s not on duty now and he doesn’t have a subpoena so he wasn't going to come down to court.

The Court: You’re saying a week ago he said I won’t bring it because I’m not under subpoena?

Ms. Cameron: He told me on February 11th.

The Court: That he’s not on duty today and he wouldn’t bring it without a subpoena?

Ms. Cameron: Yes.

The Court: Did you issue a subpoena?

Ms. Cameron: No, Your Honor, I didn’t have authority to.

That's the kind of thing that will make you give some serious thought to a jury waiver on remand.

Search

Recent Entries

  • May 25, 2017
    "Clarifying" post-release controls
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Grimes
  • May 23, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Allied offenses, and two search cases
  • May 23, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Allied offenses, and two search cases
  • May 22, 2017
    Case Update
    Is SCOTUS looking for a forfeiture case? Plus, appellate decisions on expungement and restitution, plain error, and what a judge has to tell a defendant about sex registration
  • May 19, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part II
    Decisions on lineups and prior calculation and design, and two out of eight (eight!) pro se defendants come up winners,
  • May 17, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th - Part I
    Taking a first look at some of the 8th District's decisions over the past two weeks
  • May 16, 2017
    Case Update
    Stock tips, Federal sentencing reform goes dormant, schoolbag searches, and the retroactivity of State v. Hand
  • May 8, 2017
    Case Update
    Death in Arkansas, a worrisome disciplinary decision, and appellate cases on speedy trial, arson registration, use of prior testimony, and the futility of post-conviction relief
  • May 2, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    Nothing but sex
  • May 1, 2017
    Case Update
    SCOTUS closes out oral argument for the Term, the Ohio Supreme Court has seven of them this week, and we report on a decision where you'll probably want to play Paul Simon's "Still Crazy After All These Years" in the background while you read about it