Welcome to The Briefcase

Commentary and analysis of Ohio criminal law and whatever else comes to mind, served with a dash of snark.  Continue Reading »

×

May 23, 2006

A reminder by the court in Olynyk v. Andrish that you can voluntarily dismiss a case more than once, if you're careful.  Rule 41(A) actually provides three means of dismissing your case:  by simple notice by the plaintiff, under 41(A)(1)(a), by stipulation of the parties, under 41(A)(1)(b), or by order of court, under 41(A)(2).  Without getting into the procedural history in Olynyk, which is as confusing as the DHARMA Initiative's orientation film on Lost, the plaintiff had requested the court to dismiss the case once, and then later filed a notice dismissal.  The trial court entered an order treating this as a dismissal with prejudice.  Judge Gallagher's opinion in Olynyk contains a thorough review of Ohio law showing that the "double dismissal" rule applies only to notice dismissals under 41(A)(1)(a).  Judge McMonagle, in her concurring opinion, also notes correctly that the trial court had no authority to enter its order after the dismissal; once the notice of dismissal is filed, the trial court loses jurisdiction.

Search

Recent Entries

  • June 23, 2017
    Crime and the First Amendment
    Facebook and sex offenders, and encouraging someone to kill himself
  • June 20, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    I come a cropper, plus inventory searches and mandatory probation
  • June 19, 2017
    Case Update - SCOTUS
    What's coming up in the US Supreme Court in the next two weeks
  • June 12, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    After weeks in the desert, we come upon an oasis of defense wins
  • June 7, 2017
    A switch in time
    Why what the Supreme Court did in Aalim II and Gonzales II is a bad thing
  • June 6, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    A turnabout on prior calculation and design, and harmless error in all its manifestations
  • June 5, 2017
    Case Update
    A death penalty case, fourteen years after the crime, and we're just getting started. And two appellate decisions on search and seizure.
  • May 31, 2017
    What's Up in the 8th
    "What's a law enforcement accountability activist?" asked someone never, but the answer is here. Plus, cell phone experts, joinder, and the fading glory that was State v. Hand.
  • May 30, 2017
    Case Update
    One searches SCOTUSblog in vain for decisions which would be of interest to the uncounted hordes of this blog's regular readers; one of the Court's opinions last week deals with the Hague Service Convention's rules on international service by mail,...
  • May 25, 2017
    "Clarifying" post-release controls
    A look at the Supreme Court's decision in State v. Grimes